We live in complicated times now. Antisemitism is wrong, however, there seems to be a lot of strangeness in people’s minds relating to Isreal. Israeli influence in American life seems very apparent, however, people aren’t allowed to talk it, and that creates a general sense of frustration, which opportunists can use to steer conversations towards conspiratorial ends.
But…
Lilly Gaddis, the aspiring Oprah Winfrey of Nazi America, is a good case study about how conservatives can be easily radicalized into Far Right, White Supremacist politics. However, Lilly may not be some innocent victim who has been brainwashed. There is accountability on her part. She is also indicative of the ever-growing monetization and normalization of Nazi politics in mainstream American life under late-stage capitalism (i.e., a land dominated by the “simulacra and simulation” of the internet, where racists have learned to use bot-farms, memes, fake identities, revisionist history accounts [such as depicting the Nazis as heroic], trolling, replicant accounts, burner accounts, etc., as a means of promoting white supremacist narratives).
Lilly, like most racists, have an obsession with black people. Black people live in their heads rent free. White supremacists despite not liking any race that is not “white”, seems to only call out black people, which really shows the innate fear around black people. For example, Lilly Gaddis in her segment on the Pier’s Morgan Show, discusses how she openly uses the N-word because A) she doesn’t like black people and B) using racial epithets is her way of ensuring that free speech is preserved.
Let me get this point out of the way before I go on. Lilly claims to be “promoting free speech” but the inevitable consequence of her political ideology is the ERASURE of FREE SPEECH. Conservatives do not want free speech, but rather they want to use it as of now to bring forth their racial “Imperium” and then get rid of it. For example, Lilly claims to be about free speech, but she doesn’t advocate for anyone else’s or their right to have it as well. She actually disdains free speech when you think about it. That is the irony of this “conservative crusade for free speech”, and they have such cognitive dissonance, that they don’t understand the flaws in their thinking. Conservatives are often anti-LGBTQ, anti-diversity, anti-immigrant, anti-female empowerment, anti-union, anti-artistic expression, anti-sexuality and sexual health, etc. Conservativism’s inevitable conclusion and victory is the erosion of free speech in order to preserve the status quo. If Lilly believes in using extreme racial hate speech to preserve free speech, then why doesn’t see support…let’s say…freedom of pornography or freedom to ingest whatever substances you want? I am not comparing porn or drug decriminalization to hate speech, but if Lilly were a true “free speech absolutist”, then why doesn’t she publicly advocate for these things too? Because conservatives don’t really believe in free speech.
Lilly is simply a basic Republican, from a sheltered background, who got radicalized further into conservative thinking, and she thinks she’s an “Oi Oi!, Screwdriver punk band listening” or unique, but really her ideology is illiberal, unenlightened, etc. It is also ungodly if we consider Christianity because she creating an idol are her race.
I have heard Lilly say she uses the N word for free speech, but my response would be, “Why only black people? What is your obsession with black people? Why don’t you use slurs against any other group?”. The reasons Lilly only targets black people is because she is tapping into a universal disdain for blackness that can appear in other groups that aren’t black, so she’s calculating to get the sympathy of anti-black sentiments in non-white groups, because that is the biggest target she wants to take out first, and then she will maybe claw herself towards attacking other groups.
Also, Lilly got fired from her job in North Carolina for using N word (which I will talk about again below), but in her response video she “thanked black people for helping her get famous”. This is further proof of Lilly’s obsession with black people and her disdain for black existences.
This aside, I noticed Lilly somewhere online conversing with Owen Shroyer, who was Alex Jones sidekick on the Right-Wing conspiracy site, InfoWars. Lilly is an antisemite and racist, but she is talking and possibly coordinating with Shoyer who is…. Jewish. Strange. Lilly in her past comments found on Twitter before her infamy online is that she used to be a milquetoast American Republican conservative, which of course meant paying homage to Zionism, Israel, Evangelical Christian Millennialism, etc.
What I suspect that others may not be suspecting is that Lilly, Owen Shoyer, and others in the Right-Wing eco-system are doing what we call “Getting a head of the narrative”.
They may not be truly antisemitic, however, they are racists, and colorist, like many Zionists are, but by invading, co-opting, and controlling antisemitic narratives – which largely stems from a rise in criticizing Israel – they can divert attention away from Israel to the benefit of Zionist Jews and also Zionist Evangelical Christians.
Lilly hyper-focusing on black people is the default strategy for most conservatives to distract from other issues, deep analysis of systemic injustice, abuse of power by the state, etc.
For example, Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire, often hyper-focuses on Black Americans (e.g., pushing the trope of fatherless black homes, high crimes rates, the defectiveness of black culture as he sees it, etc.) knowing that there’s a groomed anti-black sentiment within the American consciousness, yet he does this to distract from issues such as the Israel-Hamas War. This is likely why Ben Shapiro in 2025 is hinting support for pardoning Derek Chauvin, who is the Minneapolis Police Officer made famous for killing George Floyd. Conservatives, Trump, Shapiro, etc., seem to believe that pardoning Chauvin will cause social unrest thus A) distracting from humanitarian issues in Israel, B) distracting from the failed economic promises that Trump claimed he would do, and C) possibly enable the Trump Administration to practice repealing the Civil Rights of US citizens with laws such as the Insurrection Act.
The Trump Administration for example has been using the Alien Enemies Act to detain immigrants, refugees, undocumented immigrants, etc., and this has been challenged by the courts, because even illegal immigrants get due process because the word “illegal” implies legality, and only courts can try cases. The Trump Administration is essentially performing state sanctioned vigilante justice, rather than going through the Constitutional cornerstone of due process.
If Trump’s possible Chauvin pardon seems too risky, then civil unrest pertaining to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), would have the same effects such as Trump activating the National Guard in U.S. cities.
However, another key example of how Zionist Jews and Zionist Evangelical Christians work with the Far Right can be seen with the outlet called Rebel Media, which was one of the organizers of the United the Right Rally at Charlottesville, Virgina, and this outlet is owned by a Canadian Jewish person called Ezra Levant.
Lilly was a standard Republican, before she got radicalized, and I truly suspect I know why. She was your basic pro-life, Pro-Israel, small government conservative, but now she is an “awoken” cigarette smoking Far Right commentator.
What happened? I suspect the guy who knocked her up pushed her further into Right Wing thinking. There is no real record of who her “baby day” is, but she is a mother and based on her videos she did a natural birth (going so far as calling women weak who don’t do the same thing).
The only reason I threw that random tidbit of information in there is because she seems to take “weakness” not too kindly. One could even say her wanting to push the limits of free speech is more so out of a deep-rooted desire to inflict pain, weed out weakness, etc. Better put, Nazi like stuff.
She seems also seems like a tomboy as far as the old terminology goes, but being conservative, thus needing to emulate traditional gender roles, the mixture of that “rough and tumble, insensitive” masculinity that she grew up with (likely with brothers), with her duty to traditional femininity equates to her being a… bitch. Seriously, a rude bitch. She also has commented on what she considers to be a boyish physique.
She seems to have been a relatively sheltered and privileged girl from a Christian conservative home in North Myrtle Beach, SC, but also potentially Wilmington, NC. North Myrtle Beach and Wilmington are not that far away from each other actually.
She may be related to Patricia Gaddis, Marc Gaddis, Alex Gaddis (who is US Army), Jared Gaddis, and Lucas Gaddis. To find this, all I did was go to her Instagram, went to her followers and typed in Gaddis, and did the same thing for anyone’s profile that was public. Watching her YouTube videos, she stated she has brothers, so personality wise she was raised with some “boyish” “rough around the edges” bantering tendencies with her siblings. She seems to be an adopter of “boys will be boys”, and this may well be all innocent in the context of a nuclear family, but I could also see such as mentality, particularly for a conservative woman, laying the basis for a woman actually defending patriarchy, being dismissive of topics such as rape culture, toxic masculinity, etc.
I say this because, well, Lilly has said very racist things, endorsed Neo Nazi bands such British Nazi Band, Screwdriver, etc. Nazis have a very negative and limited viewpoint of women, and women often are some of the biggest enablers of patriarchy, etc.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skrewdriver
In a recent Instagram post, she was in Wilmington, NC with her son, where they visited an old slave house, called the Bellamy Mansion Negro House. Lilly sort of sees herself as a Southern Belle.
Also, about her, she enjoys water sports such as surfing and was a lifeguard with Ocean Rescue. Also, she rides horses and has vacationed at the Biltmore Estates.
She also seems to have some sort of model aspirations in that she often does glamour shots of herself. Her modeling reminds me of the racism in the modelling industry such as the infamous comments made by Tommy Hilfiger once he realized black people were wearing his clothes.
According to her photography/graphic arts website, she attended Liberty University and studied Strategic Communications and was Pre-Law. She has an old student Youtube account where she did amateur commercial and product placement projects.
Liberty University is a very conservative Christian college in Virginia founded by the Fallwell family. Liberty University is also a pipeline college for conservative students into politics, similar to Hillsdale College, Patrick Henry College, Bob Jones University, Oral Roberts University, and schools in the Great Midwest Athletic College, etc.
However, Lilly may have also attended Western Carolina University for a little bit, possibly playing tennis, per one of her Instagram pages under the tag llddisss
She also has other accounts in Instagram such as theobservantpatriot, thelillygaddis_, lillyssurfphotography, etc.
On one of her Twitter accounts in 2019, she posted “I dated an Iranian and a former Muslim and he will be the first person to tell you Islam is NOT a religion of peace”
She enjoys photography with one photo I found online being taken near the Cherry Grove Inlet section of North Myrtle Beach.
I suspect Lilly is simply a person brainwashed by the amalgamation of 1) Intellectual Dark Web – a very corny term by the way – with figures such as Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Sam Harris, etc., i.e., many people in Joe Rogan’s universe (2) conservatives alleging censorship especially when Donald Trump was kicked off of Twitter, (3) a reaction to Social Justice, notably to movements which some interpreted as critical of white people, such as the Black Lives Matters movement, etc., and (4) traditional Republican politics which always flirted with Far Right ideology such as Pat Buchanan distilling Civil Rights into a Marxist plot to destroy America, etc.
Lilly may have been born in 1998 and likely being from South Carolina, she was in the region when contentious issues were unfolding. She may have been around sixteen years old in 2015 when Dylann Roof, a white supremacist, murdered nine Black Americans who were attending church. Dylann’s shooting was supposedly in response to rising racial tensions, such as those which arose after the 2014 murder of Trevyon Martin.
So, take a girl raised in the South (which isn’t an inherently racist place like the media depicts), but in a place like South Carolina, which does still suffer from a racial-economic divide, Lilly shifted from childhood (which may have had racism in the home) to teenage angst in a nation where race was at the forefront of conversation.
Many white people did not understand Black Lives Matters for example. Rather than understanding it as “Back Lives Matter too”, they saw as “Black Lives Matters only, and we don’t care about anyone else”.
People were seriously that closed minded about it, but in places, notably in the South, where there are cultural, economic, and political divides are around the black-and-white lines, progressive liberation movements can inspire tensions on both sides. For example, white people seeing black people who they see as “ghetto”, “thugs”, “criminals”, “bullies”, etc., suddenly being given sympathy by the media and the Ivy Tower, creates a sense of anger, pettiness, etc.
Slavery and segregation created parallel universes unfortunately and places like South Carolina it can be felt.
Sometimes conversations around race, notably when some (emphasis on some) black people discuss white supremacy, the rhetoric can come off to some as reverse racism and sometimes petty. Also, some black people do try to capitalize on racial strife, often providing nothing more than commentary. Not making an excuse, but many white people feel “silenced”, blamed, scapegoated, etc.,
Yet, the irony is that, sure, individually many white people are totally fine, yet systemically white people did and still do benefit from a system that paints minorities, notably Black Americans in a negative light.
Black people for example exploded with analysis, commentary, etc., on race during the heyday of the BLM movement. There was a pent-up aggression at being seen as inherently criminal, stereotyped, etc. Many white supremacists used this era as a prime recruiting ground, and the election of Trump, whether Republicans want to admit it or not, did involve a white backlash to what some perceived as anti-whiteness.
The irony to me is progressivism is not targeting white people, but rather targeting systems that are often layered with whiteness, in that whiteness is used as a defensive mechanism of the system.
In a nation built on a foundation of colonial exploitation, a racial caste system was designed by elites, so that poor or working-class whites would see themselves as part of the inner one percent, despite not being included in it.
Rather, they were simply used as a buffer for the wealthy, and rather than having economic benefits, many white people simply had the “dividend or wages of whiteness”, i.e., social currency, as thinkers such as W.E.B DuBois would say.
For example, you can be the hardest working and successful black person, but people will lump you into their worst stereotypes about being black, yet a white person who does nothing can simply appropriate the successes of other white people and get away with it.
You often hear things such as “white people invented civilization”, but my rebuttal to a person who says that is, “well, what did you do?”, and often people go silent.
Why do people vote for a party that broke up unions, got rid of pensions, outsourced jobs, supported mass incarcerations, poisoned their food supply, shifted tax burdens onto the working class and away from the rich?
Because, whiteness and the system are largely the same thing, and the value of whiteness is so much that people will give away anything as long as that is protected in their eyes, and especially if the system gives them a target to direct their anger at.
This is why we are seeing Nazism in our late-stage capitalist existences. Nazism is the epitome of lacking awareness, accountability, and self-reflection.
Since our system is based on exploitation and division, it can only go on overdrive when it realizes it can’t keep hiding its own inherent flaws, contradictions, etc.
The game has already been won and those who won it have to keep us convinced that it all still matters, because our “faith” (our, “credo”) props up their vast wealth, which we too are hostages of, since we rely on the wages of owners, and by owners, I mean an ever-growing limited amount of private equity firms, conglomerates, corporate monopolies, etc.
Seriously, imagine playing monopoly, someone wins, but they won’t let you leave or start over. Why would they? They won. Now imagine if you don’t play the way they want, you get evicted, a cop drags you aways, etc.
We live in a cyclical boom-and-bust, buy the dip, centrally managed, fiat-inflationary-monied regime, that is controlled by politicians who answer to the rich.
The central management of the money supply is not the issue, but rather the fact that monetary policy is catered towards preserving the interests of the rich, corporations, banks, etc., since a few firms are so large, that forcing them to truly live by free market principles would be disastrous for everyone, either by exacerbating monopolies or by creating a market so unstable that things would naturally crash and burn.
Technology is used to provide convenience (which we lavishly live in to escape from life) but technology’s main goal is to extract value more efficiently (even while we watch TV now, our information is being mined since it has value), but technology also reduces the need for human labor. Yet humans still need to fight for a limited number of jobs, while still owing rents, bills, etc., because…everything in the USA is a private enterprise, since America runs on liberalism, i.e., a system whose core tenant is private property rights and idealistic notions of fair exchange.
With the social need to “Keep up with Jones”, and the fact job requirements are more and more ridiculous, often costing very expensive education, then society naturally tries to make money in ways once perceived as taboo such as in sex-work, but also everyone trying to be an “influencer” hoping to stike it rich from algorithm-advertising money and donations.
Capitalism’s logic is running thin and with so many humans, it’s running into an issue. Creating economies-of-scale and efficiency reduces labor but people need labor to pay bills in a system based on charging to exist. The only real remedy is to hedge capitalism with socialism such as subsidized housing, healthcare, education/skills training, public transit, etc. Money needs to be diverted from living and towards buying goods and services in the marketplace, but the government can create demand by creating new “complexes” such as a green energy infrastructure complex.
The rich, corporations, etc., pay for campaigns, intellectuals, “libertarian think tanks” (i.e., the CATO Institute, Mises Institute, the Donor’s Trust, Mont Pelerin Society, the Atlas Network, etc.) to muckrake the government and welfare, despite the elites getting their own welfare.
Capitalism has evolved from endorsing itself with paid-for cheerleaders such as Milton Friedman or Thomas Sowell, to relying on Right-Wing postmodern mind-melt by rewarding trolls, sometimes called YouTube influencers, with money paid out by the Google Algorithm. These influencers are the current baton holders selling the dream of “everyone can make it” under capitalism, because people erroneously feel that if they get rewarded by it, they can’t honestly critique it.
But, as already stated, the system layers itself with a toxic intersectionality, with whiteness being the biggest and most entrench block, that pits genders, races, etc., against each other.
To me it is ironic that the term intersectionality, despite it being co-opted by the political-left, was coined at the University of Chicago (i.e., a school known for its conservative economic thinking where Milton Friedman was a professor at).
Whiteness is romanticized, honored, etc., through media and film (traditionally relegating non-white men to side roles as means of preserving the white male ego), so all the worker bees can feel some piece of social dividend, even if their towns are rusted, polluted shells of themselves.
Even Christianity has been co-opted by it, which is why colonial-variants of Christianity are often white supremacist in nature, because religion serves as a deification of racial supremacy, which ironically contradicts the lessons of impermanence and transcendence the Bible provides. If anything, the “do what they whist” mentality of capitalism is more Luciferian than the supposed “godlessness” of socialism as conservatives allege.
That’s the sad thing about Lilly. She’s no revolutionary. She is a mindless follower and doesn’t even realize it. She is predictable. To be expected.
Lilly became famous (well, infamous) when she said the N-word while doing one of her Trad-Wife cooking-with-commentary segments. She was fired from her job at Rophe, a black woman owned business that seems to provide elder care services, and this business received threats after letting her go.
Back to her biography…
Lilly was going by Lilly Leigh Gaddis Coleman, and was a mother, so she must have got married. Sources during this time I found had her living in Wilmington, North Carolina. I suspect her husband helped tripped her over from the casual racism and dismissiveness within standard Republican politics, to white supremacy politics.
Going through her IG pages, simply searching Coleman, I find Oscar Coleman (scarbeenhavin), William Coleman (_williamcoleman), a page called Oscar & Will Fitness (fitness_coleman_), and a John Luke Coleman (jcoleman_36), but also a Daniel Coleman (daniel_coleman28). So, she has relation to this people somehow.
Lilly Gaddis is the inevitable opportunist who arose from the toxicity laid by earlier figures such as Meghan Kelly and Tomi Lahren who had a “restrained type of conservatism” which involved promoting ignorance with plausible deniability in which they could allege that whatever offensive things they may have said wasn’t what they actually meant and using coded language to convey white supremacy in veiled ways.
Further, Lilly is building off of Candace Owens, who herself copied Meghan Kelly, who tripped the wire of full blown public antisemitic discourse.
Candace Owens, being an opportunist herself, went full blown antisemite, by simply responding to a calling within some conservative circles to drop traditional Zionism in favor of criticism towards Israel, which was seen as a burden to American sovereignty and the reason for disastrous wars that have coincided with waning American influence and the influx of Muslim refugees.
This anti Zionism was a natural consequence of conservative’s propensity for conspiracy theories (e.g., The New World Order, the UN confiscating guns, humans being microchipped, theories about how “Cultural Marxism” is unraveling white male patriarchal and nationalistic systems, etc.).
Pro-Israel conservatives are called “Kosher-servatives” by anti-Zionist conservatives.
He is no longer on YouTube, but there was a popular YouTube content creators called Adam Green who ran a page and site called Know More News. Know More News at first seemed like an outlet which was analyzing Israel in a pragmatic sense, but it was later revealed to be anchored in white paranoia, old antisemitic tropes, etc. Adam Green, despite me not supporting his ideology, did reveal something important things about how MAGA, Alex Jones, etc., were really just Zionists, using conservatism for the benefit of Zionism.
Regardless, Know More News as a BIG part in the development of current online antisemitism, which people such as Lilly Gaddis, whether she realizes it or not, is influenced by. I wrote about Adam Green in the below blog post.
Traditionally, conservatives have distracted people away from criticizing Israel by focusing their attention on other minorities such as black people, for example Ben Shapiro at the Daily Wire is notorious for laser focusing on black issues to distract from any criticizing or analysis on Israel.
Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA employs a similar strategy to Shapiro, i.e., “everyone hates or is annoyed by black people, so always default to that position” strategy, but even Kirk cannot balance or contain the real antisemitic forces in parts of the Right-Wing movement. Charlie Kirk, despite his open racism, white right’s apologia, and biblically inspired patriarchy, is not radical enough for many.
Thus, Lilly sees a market opportunity.
This is why Nick Fuentes rose to prominence with his counter Turning Point movement, called the American First movement. This American First movement then coincides with the nativist white only group of Patriot Front and others through the grapevine of right-wing extremism such as Patriot Prayer, etc.
Lilly is simply more far-right than Candace and since Candace is black, she will never be truly accepted into the white ethno-nationalist visions which Lilly is becoming the spokesperson for.
Candace knows this so she and Lilly are in an arms race and Cold War of vitriol spanning racism, anti-female empowerment, xenophobia, and antisemitism.
Lilly has even admitted to using people of color to accomplish white supremacist objectives. For example, Lilly praises Kanye West despite her openly admitting that she is only using black conservatives.
Lilly, like most of us, does not want a real job and wants to get paid by YouTube’s algorithm or paid by a pay-wall subscription/donation model. YouTube, Instagram, Telegram, etc., makes it very easy for extremists to make a living., and leaders such as Mark Zuckerberg are more likely to try to fit into this space rather than shut down or police racism online. To no one’s surprise at all, people in these Right Wing and Far Right spaces see Zuckerberg as a poser.
In Lilly’s brain, her thesis to politics, is that free speech can only be maintained with extremism, and censorship is inherently illiberal. One could say, sure, she has a point, but the truth is her stance is not simply about having a society of agree to disagree matters of language or discourse, but rather she is using this as top cover to bring forth real world material change that ironically will hinder free speech by oppressing marginalized groups, enforcing conservativism and Orthodoxy onto the masses, etc.
Lilly aside, conservatives throughout the online ecosystem have been arguing they are free speech advocates yet, ironically want a world where you don’t talk about diversity or anything critical of white exceptionalism. They want a society than bans and criminalizes sexual expression between consenting adults, removes books from libraries, expels or deports students who protests on behalf of Palestinians, doesn’t believe women should work at all in many cases, and is hostile towards religious beliefs (or lack thereof) that aren’t a white colonial variant of Christianity.
Conservatives during the Social Justice Movement of let’s say, 2014 up until the Second election of Trump on 2024 (the nail in the coffin to many of the woke era), did a good job convincing the masses that they were a victimized group against “Big Tech censorship”. For example, Right Wing grifter Tim Pool helped platform this idea of conservative persecution on Joe Rogan by debating Twitter leadership such as then CEO Jack Dorsey.
This Nazi politic that is becoming socially acceptable is a reaction to white fear about racial replacement, a rejection of perceived feelings of guilt surrounding past atrocities, an indifference to concepts such as systemic racism & patriarchy. Also, an inability to blame capitalism and elites who objectify the masses, but also an inversion of often left-wing multicultural talking points, where white conservatives are arguing themselves as being a separate, empowered group.
The flaw in this logic is that multicultural thought arose as a rebuttal to white European (often British) Colonialism and supremacist thought. Conservatives appropriating multiculturalism to advocate for white separatism denies the reasons non-European groups felt the impetus to resist their oppressors.
The truth remains that most wealth, resources, land, judicial power, and the Monopoly on state violence, etc., is in white hands. This is why white supremacy needs to manufacture scapegoats.
White supremacy use a two pronged approach to sustain itself.
In one hand it uses explicit violence and suppression, but in the other it uses victimhood to preemptively attack and suppress groups.
For example, black people have been dehumanized since they landed on American soil. Their ancient customs stripped, their names erased (often given nicknames rather than proper names), depicted as stupid, savage, and incapable despite slave labor clearing land still producing bounty to this day, etc.
Yet, when for example black people create a sense of solidarity to heal deep rooted psychological wounds of being called inferior, then white people…cry. They go “See look at them uniting and rising up!”, and use this feeling of black solidarity to promote more white separatism and supremacy.
White Rights of the 1960s and 1970s, was a direct response to Black Power, but Black Power was about regaining humanity and attempting to incubate wealth that white supremacy claimed black people were incapable of creating.
Essentially, white supremacy perpetuates a damned if you, dammed if you don’t mentality.
White supremacy despite its self-idolatry, self-romanticism, holier-than-thou mentality is…dishonorable.
It wants those oppressed to stay down and if anyone dares to stand tall, then this gesture is seen as being reverse racist, and this false allegation is used to further resolidify white supremacy.
Lilly like many others became antisemitic based on what I will call the “Zionist Meta Conspiracy”.
This Meta Conspiracy blames all of the world’s problems on Jews by having a combination of…
(1) Conspiracies about Israeli involvement in 9/11 such as the case of “The Dancing Israelis”, and the how Israel seems to have benefited the most from America’s very expensive and controversial wars in the Middle East. A lot of people believe that Benjamin Netanyahu, AIPAC, ADL, etc., controls the USA, and sometimes it is hard to argue against considering how much the USA “rolls the carpet out” for this Zionist lobby. For example, US conservatives have helped push anti-free speech “Anti-Boycott, Divest, and Sanction” Laws, and have also used protests against Israel to allege rampant discrimination against Jewish students, just so authorities and the Trump administration can withdraw funds from colleges, detain students, deport foreign exchange students on legal visas, etc.
(2) Pent-up frustration in people who are called antisemitic for critiquing Israel since the US and British media are ardently Zionist.
(3) Jews as being easy scapegoats for appearing to be disproportionately successful and helping each other out in important industries with lots of influence such as media, music, publishing, and banking, etc.
(4) Hypocrisy around Israel’s own Apartheid policies and the tribalism within Judaism such as seeing outsiders or gentiles as non-Kosher, dirty, and as being a term called “goyim,” etc. Some even argue that certain Orthodox Jewish sects see non-Jews as not being fully and spiritually human, and are thus the Jews are tasked with implementing a set of laws, known as Noahide Laws, to steer Gentiles or the Goyim closer to God [Disclaimer: I am reporting on what others are saying]
(5) The unresolved mystery of Jeffrey Epstein who was involved in human trafficking, and he was a Jewish man who seems to have bridged the worlds of media, Hollywood, modeling, etc. Yet, people also suspect him of being an Israeli spy, considering his relationship with Robert and Ghislaine Maxwell, but also ties to Director of Central Intelligence, Bill Burns.
Epstein not only represents the ever-growing paranoia around Hollywood, which some call Hollyweird, i.e., a place of alleged “casting couch” sex-for-work pro-bono culture, supposed “humiliation rituals” for access to insider power, and allegations surrounding the abuse of minors, but Epstein also represents a type of realpolitik that many see as dishonorable, with that being a spy who used sexual incrimination or “honey pot” campaigns.
The Epstein mythology rubs off cultural onto the Sean Combs “Diddy” Scandal, where Diddy is in jail for human trafficking. Many believe that since “Jews run the music industry”, that this Diddy situations was a parallel sex entrapment campaign.
The mixing and merging of the Epstein and Diddy situation, not only pushes antisemitism, but it also feeds into the demonization of hip-hop culture, to the delight of moral crusaders. Figures such as Kanye West helps to push this conspiracy but Kanye’s paranoia is really him lashing out because of his own failures, mental illness etc. Kanye as become a mascot for antisemitism, but white supremacist love that he is black because it takes the light away from them.
Further, this Epstein-Diddy subplot conspiracy promotes conspiracies surrounding black male sexuality by alleging homosexuality underrides the hyper-masculinity in the music that is exemplified by black males. Essentially, painting a genre of black music as not only degenerate, but also secretly “gay”, while also controlled by “Jews”, and this only serves in boosting the egos within white supremacy, but also boosting voices in black nationalism sects (such as the equally antisemitic Nation of Islam, who are known for blaming the Jews).
Essentially, racists can kill two birds with one stone by overlapping the Diddy and Epstein situations. Even if there is an overlap between the two men or whomever controlled the two men, it doesn’t mean that Jews or Black people overall are responsible for what is going on, but white supremacists want to link them together to create a grand narrative that feeds into white supremacist belief systems.
The central hub in connecting these conspiracies could been seen as the “Qanon infrastructure”, i.e., the conspiracy movement rooted in Trump mythology and deification, which has a hyper-paranoid focus on sex abuse, Demonic rituals, etc.
In essence, people are simply copying the storyline of Stanley Kubrick’s Eye’s Wide Shut and they applied that insider secret society within the film to real world industries. The “Kubrick Effect” as I call it, made into twenty-teens online “hip hop Illuminati” conspiracies, so when Diddy got arrested many felt vindicated in their conspiracy beliefs, which often goes off onto multiple divergent tangents on multiple subjects.
(6) Conspiracies around billionaire George Soros, where the conservative movement used Soros as a scapegoat. Not only was a Jewish man blamed for all the world’s problems, distracting from the wealth held by rich white or non-Jewish people’s, but ironically his evil villain persona was spun by two Jewish political consultants, thus showing how some Jews, notably Zionist ones, will help promote antisemitism because increased hate and violence towards Jews enables Jewish organizations to clamp down on criticism of topics relating to the State of Israel by explicitly conflating antisemitism with anti-Zionism. The more people learned what was going on, they assigned Jews with dishonorable characteristics.
(7) People who aren’t Jewish often see Jews as stand-offish, so without cultural bridges being made, people naturally build up suspicions, notably as Jews appear to be overrepresented in powerful industries.
Of course there is your standard “Old World” antisemitism that has never went away that dates back to organized riots against Jews (called Pogroms) from the York Massacre, the expulsion of Jews from England , the Rhineland Massaces during the First Crusade, the Holocausts of World War 2, and the Inquisitions, explusions, and forced conversions of Jews in Spain.
Jews are easy scapegoats who get blamed for pornography despite non Jews voluntarily participating in this industry. If anything white males are never judged or vilified for participation but rather women are slut-shamed despite being desired, and non-white men, notably black men are often used by anti-porn crusaders – often at the nexus of Christian white supremacy – to depict porn as grotesque, unnatural, etc. Caricatures of black men with white women are often used to shame away the likihood of interracial relationships in the real world, tapping into women’s fear of being socially ostracized, despite as restated, white men disproportionately benefitting from this industry both monetarily and asethically (i.e., never judged and seen as safer options).
Jews also get blamed for modern music such as rap music, which is often vilified by moral crusaders despite many non-black people consuming the music and most black people having no say in what is made in their names, which thus spurs conspiracies within the black community against Jews surrounding Jewish objectification of black culture despite benefitting as white passing people’s themselves. This sentiment is as old as vaudeville, minstrel music Jazz, etc. As a side note, conspiracies around rap music ar all over the place. Some allege it was the CIA promoting it to destroy black solidarity, while elsewhere Jews are blamed. Conspiracies around rap music often comes from a real world sense of hopelessness searching for an easy explanation, and in reality black people are often the most vulnerable to the blowback of geopolitical machinations, such as drugs flooding the streets of the USA due to American interference in Latin America or Southeast Asia. Black people, like any people, start weaving an easily digestible correlation, and this noble attempt at truthseeking can morph into conspiracies of hate.
Jews are even blamed for modernity itself where some argue as led to a materialist, Godless world of relativity because of Freudian psychology, Einstein relativity, etc.
Antisemitism to me is when a system simply needs to blame something rather than admit their flaws in it’s own system. A convenient excuse. Are their Jewish conspiracies? Probably, but to insinuate Jews are solely to blame is ridiculous.
For example, Kings of Europe used Jews as financiers, but then blamed the Jews when times got tough. The same way how Jews get blamed when a recession happens or worst, a depression, the kings of old blamed Jews for their own follies. European nobles where essentially our modern 1% to upper middle class, and despite benefitting when times are good, they often blame Jews when times are bad.
How to Fight Antisemitism? By antisemitism I am not talking about defending the state of Israel but rather protecting Jewish people in places such as the United States.
1) Point the fingers at people are to actually blame for current economic conditions, wealth disparity, social alienation, etc., such as many of the Non-Jewish, Right Wing, Republican millionaires and billionaires who control things. Counter the Soros conspiracy by pointing the fingers to people such as Uihlein Family, etc., to counter narratives.
Why are these white, racist, billionaires and millionaires getting off the hook while everyone else becomes sitting ducks from terrorists because the conspiracy theories hiding their power? It’ bullsh-t. It’s bull. How many innocent people from all races, colors, creeds, etc., have been the victims of white supremacist conspiracy-based violence? Why doesn’t Joe Rogan talk about these billionaires? Hell, Elon Musk is literally a white supremacist a but no one can stop him.
I am not even Soros fan. I have no idea who he is. But I find it unfortunate he took all the blame, and what’s sadder is some Jews helped demonize him.
If you’ve read any of my other blog posts, you will notice I talk about a group I call the “Anglo-American, Continental, Zionist, Saud” (ACZS Network), which is the de facto power bloc that controls the West. Often the Zionists, i.e., a stand in for the Jews, are often blamed (because of people like Adam Green of Know More News), but there needs to more focus on American, British, and Saudi interests, who aren’t Jewish, but who wield immense power in shaping world conditions.
The Jews as of today to me don’t seem to do a good job at fighting those who pose a real threat, i.e., the actual Nazis, but rather they are going after student protests movements. Trust me, a college student protesting is not the same threat level as a Neo Nazi wanting to do a mass shooting or terror attack.
I wish someone would explain this to people such as Bill Maher, who is Jewish via his mother. Bill got hung up on this anti-woke campaign, that he seems to have lost track of traditional enemy of Jews, i.e., white supremacy and Nazis. Playing this “enlightened centrist” role is not helping anyone, because it makes the mistake of creating “false equivalencies” such as convincing people the “Far Left” is as dangerous as the Far Right.
It seems Jews have stopped fighting Nazis and their narratives (which was the case when I was growing up), but oddly they are hyper focusing on liberal or Leftist groups because these groups are providing humanitarian counter arguments to IDF operations in places such as Gaza.
This shift from focusing on fighting Nazis and “Aryanism”, towards focusing on Leftist humanitarians to me proves that… Jewish groups have been calculating towards their goal of helping Isreal “cross the finish line”, which is construction of a Biblical like state (for Jews only).
It is about prophecy.
Jews don’t see the Right Wing as a threat, and they have embedded themselves into the Right Wing (Ben Shapiro, Ezra Levant, etc.), to help distract from criticism on Israel, but now their main obstacle are the Leftist humanitarians. But…both sides are aware of what is going on, creating mistrust on both sides of the political spectrum, thus creating a combined overarching environment for antisemitism to grow. There actually seems to be an admiration for white supremacy withing certain Zionist sects, and this may have evolved out of the ‘Might makes Right” mentality adopted by many Jews after the horrors of the Holocaust.
2) Social media needs to do a better job of fighting racism, Nazis, etc., online. That includes even clamping down on bot accounts or anonymous accounts. If people want to exercise free speech they, do it under their legal name, so the rules of the game are fair. However, Mark Zuckerberg seems more interested in bowing down to Right Wing Trumpian power, than fighting it, and I suspect because he as a Jewish man, knows that despite the threats of violence from MAGA inspired white supremacy, the MAGA movement is also Zionists, so they are supporting Israeli supremacy in Israel on their quest to have a fully Jewish state.
3) Get rid of Anti-BDS laws which convinces people that Isarel has unconstitutional power over the United States of America.
Mitchell Research Group 