I recommend reading tbe article first, then watching the videos and then going to older posts I wrote.
Beginning note: Jay Dyer becoming critical of Israel is from a matter of convenience in order to stay relevant because of the internal war between Zionist conservatives and Anti Zionist (often antisemitic) conservatives. Dyer is an opportunist who realized he was losing ground to actual antisemites such as Nick Fuentes, etc. But, Dyer was losing to people such as Will Sexton (i.e., Vrillium) who shares Dyer’s Orthodox faith.
(Addition 5.24.26) I joke that Zoomers like the Orthodox Church because Icons are basically…memes. (End Addition).
(Added 5.20.2026). I have been tracking Jay Dyer’s work for years. He was influential on my thought to a degree but we are fundamentally different as far as politics and our beliefs as to who is responsible for causing the issues of the world. But, his basic teachings on Classical philosophy and his teachings on The Enlightenment were influential to me, but I still consider him a Right Wing reactionary following in the footsteps of Good Ole Boy conspiracy theorists of old. Today is 5.20.2026.
I began writing this back in late April 2026.
I noticed that Dyer has been getting noticed such as being platformed on Piers Morgan, so Dyer is gaining larger platforms to spread his message and visibility. He appeared alongside Adam Sosnic (a Zionist business bro associated with Patrick Bet David and Valutainment), Emily from “Emily Saves America”, and Dave Smith, the Right leaning libertarian comedian and anti-war activist.
1. Introduction:
You will notice that in many conspiracy theory frameworks or theses that there are often common tropes throughout. Shadowy cabals, secret (gnostic) knowledge, symbology and semiotics, a linear and oversimplified flow to history, connections across seemingly disconnected topics, a heroic story arc, a sense of victimization amongst those promoting the theories, and supernatural, extraterrestrial, and/or metaphysical concepts, etc.
One such framework I call is the Dyer Thesis by Jay Dyer.
Notable names in contemporary conspiracy culture, or “conspiratorial political commentary”, are Dr. Jiang (who is not an actual Doctorate holder and could plausibly be working for the Chinese Communist Party similarly to the curious case of Chinese double agent and Pro-MAGA con-artist, Guo Wengui).
But also the YouTuber called Moon, Alex Jones in InfoWars, Nick Fuentes (the racist Traditional Catholic who rarely speaks on theological matters), Candace Owens, Sam Hyde, Sam Tripoli, Sneako, and Tucker Carlson (who claimed to have had an experience in which he was attacked by demons while sleeping).
(Added 6.7.2026) Actor Jamie Kennedy of Scream, Malibu’s Most Wanted, Boiler Room, etc., has collaborated with Dyer and Kennedy seems fully under Dyer’s thesis.
(Added 6.7.2026) Dyer even touched upon Chud the Builder, the racist streamer who went around saying the N-word, in which Chud embraced Orthodoxy. I find it interstingly that Dyer equates white people or non-black people saying the N word as black people having a “double standard”. I actually believe Dyer doesn’t like black people or at least looks down on black people considering he’s from a Southern white conservative family from Tennessee and Dyer caricatures black culture often.
(Added 6.7.2026) Kat Von D, the famous tattoo artists became a Christian and has confessed her liking of Orthodox Icons to Dyer.
(Added 6.7.2026) Dyer has been hosted by Dr. Drew, Alex Jones with his platform Info Wars, former UFC fighter turned podcaster Jake Shields, etc.
(Added 6.7.2026) Here is Dyer with Sam Hyde
As I suspected Candace Owens is a follower of Jay Dyer, who is a noted Right Wing leaning, Orthodox Christian Conspiracy Theorist and Analyst. My inclination was proven correct when I watched Candace’s expose on Erika Kirk, titled, “Bride of Charlie: Dr. Jerri and Mrs. Hyde | Episode 2” published to YouTube on 26 February 2026 . At just minute 2:07 she mentions the book “Hollywood Babylon” which is a book by Jay Dyer.
I will go into him later even though I have written about him in another post [See: https://mitchellrg.com/2025/06/08/do-you-know-jay-dyer-the-right-wing-figure-influential-in-maga-conspiracy-based-politics-who-hates-modernity-and-thinks-the-dark-ages-were-better-how-dyers-worldview-likely-influenced-j-d-vance-a/].
All these people have in common the fact they are or appear to be Jay Dyer Fans, either directly (i.e., having watched his material) or by proxy (i.e., picking up talking points which Dyer has distilled but which have been disseminated via other people or mediums, e.g., on Reddit, X, etc.).
Even Vice President J.D. Vance has chirped some Dyer-esque talking points, despite Dyer not liking Vance’s Catholicism (which I will go into later).
Vance for example said a very Dyer-esque thing by alleging aliens are demons (though I want to say from memory that Dyer was referring to “Time Elves”, [yes – a term that is out there], in reference to Terrence McKenna, a notable “psycho-naut”, i.e., a person who engages in psychotropic drug experimentation, in which McKenna mentioned conferring with other beings while under the influence and Dyer believes things these are demons).
(Added 6.7.2026) I was randomly watching Internet Today, and they were even talking about how certain Christians are equating aliens with demons. They go more into the Scandal of the situation relating to a Catholic exorcist alleging aliens are demons (End Addition).
I wrote an article on the UFO and Missing Scientists Conspiracy. Feel free to check this out later. I argue that UFOlogy is a continuation of American Christian, Manifest Destiny Eschatology.
Relating to Dr. Jiang, a Yale Graduate who engages in “prediction history” (trying to see the future) he has been hosted on Pier’s Morgan’s Piers Morgan Uncensored, and YouTuber and ex-Special Forces content creator, Valhalla VFT. Also, Jiang is featured on The Jimmy Dore Show, but also Breaking Points hosted by Krystall Ball and Saagar Enjeti.
Jiang is a promoter of a spliced together “Meta-conspiracy narrative”, who not only appears to steal from the “Dyer Thesis” (which I will go into detail below), but also adds on classic conspiracy theories by people such as David Ike (known for his “Lizard People Rule the World” idea and his expansion upon the “Sacred Bloodlines of the Illuminati” concept in conspiracy culture).
Jiang is not very shy about his blatant antisemitism since he blames Jews in part for being behind the trajectory of world events, but Jiang offers a dual and conflicting “double play” idea in which he seems to believe Jews are actually the scapegoats to “Illuminati Groups”.
To be honest, Jiang is simply a complete mess and mash-up of paranoid conspiracy culture which he plagiarizes in our schizophrenic and postmodern information landscape. I plan on writing my thoughts on the Guo Wengui connection later.
I only want to mention Jiang because he seems to be “blowing up” in popularity, though it plausible his new found fame could be bot-driven with the help of outside parties.
However, Jiang, though mixing the theories of Dyer and Ike, he is also plagiarizing Christoper John Bjerknes.
Bjerkens believes that Jews believe that white people are descended from the Romans or are symbolic at least of Roman civilization (called Edomites or the descendants of Esau) and thus are eternal enemies. The Jews according the Bjerknes thus wish to infiltrate and subvert Western civilization, and they do this through Hasidic, Talmudic and/or Kabbalistic organizations such as Chabad Lubavitch or even the Sabbatian Franks (with the latter being a real heretical sect of Jews in the 18th century who allegedly believed that sin could help exacerbate the return of their messiah).
Further, Christianity itself is a Jewish religion that is easily manipulated by Jews is a belief of Bjerkens, and his discipline Adam Green.
Bjerknes collaborated with Adam Green who owns the site Know More News. Green is from the San Diego area, is a former ViaSat employee, and played college basketball at Cal State Stanislaus.
Green’s site and works is a Zionist expose channel which seeks to understand the Zionist lobby’s relationship with the United States, but slowly I learned that Green was just another member of the reactionary right-wing. Both Green and Bjerknes are of the belief that Jews are using the “Great Replacement Theory” to slowly exterminate the white race and the Jews do this by causing Middle Eastern wars, opening the American Southern border, etc. Bjerknes’ research is anchored by white replacement paranoia.
If you remove the white paranoia from Green and Bjerknes, their base premise is that the Zionist lobby has control over the United States via the Zionist Occupied Government, controlling both sides of the political spectrum (including the MAGA movement), and their (i.e., the Jews) goal is to use the West and USA to create a united Greater Israel.
Isreal will then erect the Third Temple (which requires a sacrifice a Red Heifer, i.e., cow) and destroy Al Asqa Mosque. Eventually the Jews will impose Noahide Laws onto the Gentile Nations which they have already done so via Anti-Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) laws (which require contractors to pledge allegiance to Israel and restrict free speech about Israel, etc.).
When you separate the white paranoia from their arguments, I agree with them on the fact that the USA is largely the manifestation of Z.O.G. and to call that antisemitic is disingenuous once you realize how much Zionist influence there is in the US and British Commonwealth governments, media, etc. It is not a conspaircy that Rabbinical Jews want to rebuild the Third Temple, breed for red cows for sacrifice (which are bred in Texas actually), and are on a quest to create a Jewish strong hold in the region.
However, I am under the belief that most Jews are innocent in this Zionist takeover, and it is wrong to blanketly label all Jews. Jews have their own internal divisions, so it seems unwise to act as if they are a coherent unit. However, Israeli public support for the Gaza Genocide an. the Epstein Files refutes my beliefs in many ways. Jews do seem prone to a collective thinking anchored in the very religoius extremism they blame on Muslims. Epstein however points to a super class of exclusive Jewish elites, who collaborate with other elites of different ethnicities, which I call the A.C.Z.S.E Network (i.e., the Anglo-American, Continental, Zionist, Saud, and Emirati) Network. This Network are the controllers of the New World Order.
Zionism to me simply serves as the most effective fascist ideology for other fascist ideologies to cling onto so they can project their power, e.g., assisting Israel militarily gives justifications to others in this network to project military power from a centralized bridgehead or locale such as from Israel since Isreal is the crossroads of the world in theory. The A.C.Z.S.E Network provides a coherent way of distilling geo-political conspiracy amongst united albeit conflicting groups.
For example, Anti-Islam is notable in the West, especially amongst the American Right Wing conservative movement. Yet, this Islamophobia contradicts America’s funding of Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, Indonesia, etc. The MAGA movement is very Islamophobic, yet, Trump signed one of the largest arms deals in modern history with them. Further, Israel despite being very Anti-Islam as seen in their treatment of Palestine and also how the Zionist lobby – both in the USA and abroad – have successfully demonized Islam whether it be from the “New Atheist” movement of Jews like Sam Harris, the “Enlightened Centrists” such as Bill Maher (who is technically Jewish due to his mother), and Neo-Conservatives such as Dennis Prager, Bill Shapiro, etc. However, Isreal has been caught selling weapons to Islamic nations such in the infamous Iran Contra Scandal. Yet, Saudi Arabia, who appears to be the acceptable face of Islamic power in the West (largely due to Saudi Arabia’s impact on the Petro-Dollar model which props up the US Greenback), the truth is Saudi Arabia and other Emirati like nations are funding war crimes in places such as Sudan and the 9/11 attackers were Saudis.
Zionism is simply the best medium or conduit for all othee parties to get what they want by appearing to side with a victimized people’s despite all parties engaging in crimes across the planet. The biggest and yet most obvious conundrum in this network is how Evangelical Christians support Israel just so Jews will convert to Christianity during the End Times, despite Jews not believing in Jesus, though totally willing ot take the money from Evangelicals and weapons from the USA.
The A.C.Z.S.E Network a like a Five Families Mafia, who are all bent on geopolitical and economic control. The Zionist Jews run international finance, the Arabic Sultanates run energy and control Islamic holy sites, Europe represents Western civilization, and the US is the muscle with the UK as its silent partner in global hegemony. Proxy groups include India who serves as the low wage middle managers and business attendants and the Three Asians of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan produce consumer products to hedge reliance on China while checking China in the region by justifying US military presence in the region.
However back to Bjerknes, interestingly, Whitney Webb, author of the popular book, One Nation Under Blackmail, who has been making a recent splash online by touring the podcaster and content creator circuit, notably to discuss the Epstein Files, has collaborated with Adam Green and thus by proxy Bjerknes.
Green, also collaborated with a somewhat YouTube folklore-ish figure named Matthew North, who did deep dives into the Zionist lobby and how figures such as Joe Rogan, Alex Jones of Info Wars and the overall MAGA movement were psychological operations to push Trump thus push the Zionist Israeli agendas unbeknownst to most Americans. I would argue that a lot of Whitney Webb’s foundational arguments are based the works of Matthew North.
I admit I use to watch both Green and North, however, once I realized their White Identity Politics, I figured I needed to separate any decent research and journalistic reporting from them. North has had influence on my understanding of Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, whereas Green helped shed light on the Israeli Lobby in the United States.
As a disclaimer, I want to state that any reference to Jews, Zionism, or Israel by myself is not intended to be antisemitic. I define antisemitism as a hatred of Jews and a promulgation of stereotypes about Jews which have historically created violence, discrimination, and mistrust towards Jewish peoples, but I do not define it as analyzing or criticizing the modern geopolitical entity of Isreal as a state.
Shifting to Candance Owens, to me she is clearly showing signs of paranoid manic behavior at times (e.g., the type of behavior from a woman who would drown her kids because “God told her to” – sorry if that is harsh).
Jay Dyer made a rebuttal video to her interestingly. The video is titled, “Candace Owens Actually Said THIS?”, published on 9 April 2026.
In this video, Dyer provides a grounded talk about how many people go crazy over conspiracy theories and see what they want to see. However, Dyer obfuscates any responsibility in setting the stage of current online conspiracy culture in which Candace is part of. Dyer’s video is the tactic of “getting a head of the narrative” because I suspect he is aware that Candace is his fan and it is a matter of time before people trace her thought to him (she even quotes his books in one of her videos).
Back to Adam Green, who could be defined as either an Atheists, but with Germanic Neo-Pagan and Anti-Zionist sensibilities, has made anti Candace Owen’s videos in which he states that Candance is a psychological operation for pushing the largely debunked Khazar Theory, because Candace pushing this theory undermines what Green feels is more legitimate research proving Jewish meddling in Western affairs.
The Khazar Theory is about how a Caucasian Kingdom converted to Judaism, and this is where the actual Jews we see today come from. To Green this theory obfuscates from his belief that Jews are behind the decline of the West and such theories shifts blame to an internal European source. To Green, the Jewish texts as is (i.e., the Talmud, Zohar, etc.) already proves Jewish intent on world conquests, so by adding in theories like the Khazars it undermines factual proof according to Green.
Green shows skepticism towards people such as Kevin McDonald, David Duke, David Ike, etc., who push Khazar and “Saturnalia” Theories, with the latter being the Jews worship Saturn (going so far as believing the Star of David can be seen on Saturn’s poles), and this theory equates Saturn to a Luciferian entity.
Such theories to Green undermine the legitimate and realist threat he feels Jews pose and having such conspiracy helps divert attention since Jews benefit from antisemitism since it enables them to shutdown criticism. This can be seen video titled, Adam Green shreds Candace Owens and the Khazar Theory | Clip from Know More News, published 20 August 2025. Green. I agree with him on the ideas that any legitimate claims that Owens has is ruined by her adding in unverified conspiracy theories akin to Qanon thinking. I am not condoning Candace, but logically, the statement stands that conspiracy theory can get in the way of actual sociology, science, geopolitical analysis, cultural relations, etc.
To Green, the real Right needs to reject Jesus outright since Christianity is a Jewish sect.
For example, Jewish figures such as Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, etc., all push Christianity, not because they agree with it, but it helps vindicate the Jewish lobby for their own political gains.
This brings Green into conflict with Jay Dyer, despite Dyer having claimed he is not a Zionists, but this contradicts Dyer’s emphasis on a prophetic Christian eschatology which entails a restoration of a Jewish State before the Jews convert to Christianity during the End Times.
To view these conflicts, see the videos titled, Jay Dyer Crashes Out on Adam Green | Clip Know More News, published on 4 September 2025; Adam Green Reacts to Rabbi Jay Dyer Pushing Yahweh Worship | Clip Know More News pushed on , and Adam Gren Reacts to Jay Dyer vs Tim Gordon | Clips from Know More News published on13 September 2025.
Green for example has issue with White Supremacist Nick Fuentes because Nick despite his antisemitism still sees Jesus as Jewish, so this creates a contradiction. You can’t hate Jews but then worship a Jewish God being Jesus. Please see the video, Adam Green Reactions to Kosher Christian Nick Fuentes | Clips from Know More News, published 19 July 2025.
JAY DYER IS A CENTRAL NEXUS
I see Jay Dyer as the central nexus point in the proliferation and normalization of most modern Right Wing conspiracy theories, because unlike most other conspiracy theorist, Dyer has a solid grounding in philosophy, so he brings a palatable – almost adjutant professor-like – means of giving credence to his theories.
Dr. Jiang and Candance Owens are essentially plagiarizing Dyer’s theses (which I will go into below) but adding in antisemitism during a time where there is legitimate concern over the West’s relationship with Isreal in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein Scandal and the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East (e.g., Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, etc.).
Candace Owens in her exposes on Erika Kirk, in the third episode, even references Jay Dyer’s Hollywood Babylon book, creating an undeniable link between her conspiracy theories and Dyer.
DYER’S BACKGROUND PART I?
First off, Dyer is a alleged stand-up comedian who went to university in Kentucky somewhere, but for over a decade has had his own website and YouTube channel where he promotes what I call the Dyer Thesis or the Dyer Conspiracy Thesis.
A film lover, Dyer often seriously and comically analyzes films to prove his religious oriented conclusions. To make himself relatable to new media, but also likely to express himself for his true personality, Dyer takes on a quasi-troll like persona online. He often wears Hawaiian shirts, uses Miami Vice script in this videos, and dabbles in electronic music such as that of the nostalgic Cold Wave genre popular amongst Millennials and Zoomers (where Cold Wave as a movement could be traced in popularity to the movie Drive with Ryan Gosling, where Gosling plays a “Sigma Male”, i.e., a stoic, lone wolf operator).
From memory, I remember Dyer saying he went to some special early education type of school and that his father may be from a US Naval background.
Dyer is from Paris, Tennessee which has a population of about 11,000 people which rest in Henry County, Tennessee. It’s. A small town between Memphis and Nashville but also not far from Paducah. It’s about 74% white and 17% black. The town gets its name from Revolutionary War hero, the Marquis Lafayette. He stated his dad was US Navy and according to his hometown paper, The Paris P.I., and he lived in San Diego for a while before relocating back to Tennessee. He attended Henry County High School in Tennessee and later went to McNeese State where he studied English. He earned a BA, but worked on a Master thesis though this seemed uncompleted. In the video about Chud the Builder, he also stated he had an uncle in US Air Force Intelligence who worked at the Pentagon. Personally, I, the writer, comes from a military family and I am a veteran so I am on insinuating Dyer’s familial ties makes him suspicious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_County,_Tennessee?wprov=rarw1
https://rocketreach.co/jay-dyer-email_54068276
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris,_Tennessee
Before I got blocked by Dyer years ago on Instagram when I asked him question about his alleged ties to Russia, I did notice a photo, probably from his parents house, of University of Tennessee memorabilia, so Dyer is essentially a white, Appalachian, Southern Protestant who eventually became Orthodox from Tennessee.
I had asked him the Russia question because he had been accused of being a Russian asset during the Russia-Gate Era considering that Orthodoxy could be seen as a strategy of the Kremlin to infiltrate the US Right Wing, which has been undergoing a reactionary, religious and traditionalist revival movement.
Ultimately, Dyer is a religious podcaster who often engages in debating why Eastern Orthodoxy is better than Catholicism and Protestantism.
However, even though this “Dyer Thesis” I will speak off deals more with conspiracies, and an analysis of these conspiracies are intended to be a means to an end to lead one to Eastern Orthodoxy, one can separate Dyer’s religious analysis from his conspiracy analysis.
His religious thesis would be its own other category to analyze and break down because it deals heavily in early Church doctrine, Classical antiquity philosophy, and debates amongst all other religions.
For the sake of this post/paper, I will only focus on analyzing his “conspiracy thesis”.
THE REDDIT AND YOUTUBE WARS OF RELIGION
Before I go on, I want to segway into what I call the “online religious wars” or the “Reddit and YouTube Wars of Religion”.
Late Gen X to Millennial and Zoomer Traditional Catholics (unfortunately with people like Nick Fuentes as a mascot – which is very unfortunate for the Catholic Church) are at odds with “Ortho-Bros”, i.e., people of the same generation but who converted and vouch for Eastern Orthodoxy (such as Jay Dyer, David Patrick Harry, Pageau, Brother Nathanael, etc.).
But there are also Protestant and Evangelicals going against both groups, however, you do have Neo-Pagan and/or Agnostic/Atheistic Right Wing movements which disagrees with all the Deistic Right Wingers, and it appears some of these these Neo Pagans refute Jesus since they see him as a Jewish invention intended to weakness European lineage. However, certain Neo-Pagans or “Heathens” have a “believe what you want” mentality so this can tolerate Jesus belief.
This specific group of Neo Pagan and Atheistic Right Wingers, I would argue are the ones who started the internal Right-Wing schism in the MAGA movement, because they see MAGA as a coopted Zionist plot using Evangelical Christianity to bring upon the destruction of the world.
In response, the Deistic Right Wing has begun to adopt more criticisms of Zionism to stay relevant considering the Neo-Pagan or Agnostic/Atheistic Right were proven right about the Zionist lobby considering Benjamin Netanyahu’s and Jared Kushner’s influence on Donald Trump, the revelations of the Jeffrey Epstein situation in which Epstein has links to Israeli intelligence, etc.
There is a lot of online drama, debates, etc., between these various Right-Wing factions.
DYER’S BACKGROUND PART II – TRULY UNWRAPPING HIS CORE THESIS
However, to rewind a bit, Dyer has spoken about how he did his university thesis on analysis of the deeper meanings of the James Bond novels and film franchise.
To Dyer, James Bond was a fictionalized telling of actual British and American intelligence endeavors in the Cold War by author Ian Fleming, who had British Intelligence ties, and was allegedly trained or involved with Camp X.
Camp X was a spy training facility in Canada where a man named William Stevenson was trained at. Stevenson is argued as being one of the main basis for the Bond character created by Fleming, and Stevenson’s job during World War II was working out of the Rockefeller Center, where British Intelligence had set up part of their American operations.
Yet, though these are compelling facts or possibilities, Dyer goes further and starts to slip in this “Dyer Thesis”, which involves a Transatlantic cabal of often British led overseers who use Occult-inspired practices to control the modern world.
Dyer has even spoke about this gnostic or Occultic tradition of the British Empire, which was then handed over to the American Empire, can be partially traced to the Queen Elizabeth’s counselor, John Dee, who practiced Hermeticism (a type of Neoplatonic framework, i.e., occultic practice). Dee could be argued as one of the main policy makers of the early British Empire. The American Empire to Dyer is largely the brainchild of the Rockefellers who use the UN, Club of Rome, the Bank of International Settlement, etc.
To Dyer, Bond as a fictional character, represents the intelligence apparatus of this “Occultic Imperium”.
Dyer, who is heavily influenced by Carroll Quigley’s book called Tragedy and Hope and his other book, The Anglo-American Establishment, where Quigley provided a sort of expose into how the “Trans-Atlanticist” network operates.
Dyer often talks about how the British Empires tension with Russia in the “Great Game” (which was a true military doctrine of the nineteenth century), let the British to use espionage to overthrow the Orthodox Monarchy of Russia.
To Dyer, Russia being the de facto center of Orthodox power was taken out by the British who had this “Occultic Imperium” agenda. To manage the inner workings of this Occultic Empire (i.e., Great Britain and the Commonwealth, the USA, NATO, etc.), organizations such as the Cliveden Set, the Milner Group, The Royal Institute for International Affairs, the Rhodes (as in Cecil Rhodes) Roundtable Group, etc., lay the policy agenda. Dyer alleges that these groups had a secretive Fabian Socialist agenda for world domination based on the successful networking of the British East India Company.
Relaing back to my statement about how Dyer often deep dives into film to provide his religious oriented thesis, he for example draws parallels between real British spy T.E. Lawrence (i.e., Lawrence of Arabia), to that of Indiana Jones films, because Lawrence and Jones used their academic work as cover to assist Western intelligence.
T.E. Lawrence’s main goal was to push British interest in the region including exploring for oil under the auspices of searching for water sources. Dyer goes into history such as illuminating figures such as David Hogarth, whom allegedly recruited Lawrence for spying operations while running the Arab Bureau of the British Empire.
Dyer here promotes compelling arguments, even though I do not overall agree with Dyer’s personal agenda.
It is obvious that competition between empires – notably of the colonial era – used subversion, regime change, and the establishment of arbitrary borders to undermine their adversaries. Because of these colonial meddlings, notably by the British Empire, we do have current issues that have resulted in atrocities spanning the ethnic tensions of Africa, the Middle East (such as that of Israel, Iraq, and Afghanistan), and Asia (notably the how the British funded an opium black-market in China to obtain tea. Yes, that happened).
But, to insert my thoughts here, even though Dyer is well versed in history and good at illuminating contradictions in history which seems to point to higher geopolitical machinations by intelligence agencies, it does not mean his overall thesis and worldview, which I define as a religious, Right Wing, patriarchal, and based on anti-Leftist or anti-Liberal framework is correct.
Dyer expands further by alleging that MI5 used figures such as the Occult leader, Alaistair Crowley, to start the American counterculture movement, which was in part a “Deep State” plot to forcibly evolve, i.e., culturally engineer a culture compatible with some sort of unforeseen future epoch which requires the eradication of the family unit, the inversion of gender roles, the erosion of ethnic and racial enclaves (where Dyer often uses the term “people groups” to bypass taking about race), etc.
Dyer also includes HG Wells quite a bit into being a player or propagandists of this global elitist network, and Dyer also incorporates the Aldous and Julian Huxley’s works and beliefs, such as Aldous’ book, Brave New World (which depicts a futuristic Platonic society) and Julian’s influence on the modern Transhumanist or Human Potential Movement.
Most of all of Dyer’s chagrin is pointed Westward, and rarely towards the East such as hat of Russia, which is why Dyer has been haunted with pro-Russia allegations.
Dyer believes that modernity is effectively a Godless and thus Satanic or Luciferian epoch, where instead of a world based on a metaphysical Christological worldview, particularly one based on a fundamentalist belief in the Judeo-Christian Creation Story, we instead are in a materialist eon, which is defined by flux, disorder, subjectivity, solipsism, postmodernism, inversion (notably between what he would consider to be the dominant masculine with the submissive feminine), and chaos.
Yet, this flux is being controlled by a class of overseers who believe in “alchemy” or “alchemical changw”, such as what he would argue to be the alchemical process of evolution (where Dyer rejects Natural Evolution).
This elitist class forces evolution upon the masses through social conditioning, scientific modification, transhumanism, transgenderism, etc., as means of obtaining some sort of singularity point, which they do through a marriage of Occultic practice (i.e., gnostic) and mad science.
According to Dyer, this class uses the ancient concept of Dialectics and Monism, to lay a framework for them to “playing both sides” of conflicts ans debates, and by laying the foundation they push us towards a transhumanist singularity point (i.e., From Monism or the belief in a singular source, we must merge to transcend back to a higher level of being). But, of course this class rules and their utopia is a dystopia of “caste based smart cities”, “genetically modified foods, meat bans and insect eating”, “a Sodom and Gomorrah sexual culture of female goddess worship”, “Fabian socialism where you own nothing”, “atheism”, “mass surveillance”, etc.
To Dyer, the elites use fake or manufactured dramas and conflicts to control both sides, on the grounds of achieiving a futurist, one world government, transhumanist state. These elites use Communism and Capitalism when convenient and even use mixed reiterations of them, i.e., Third Way politics, which are popular in neoliberal democracies, to achieve higher agendas.
Seemingly pragmatic things like Green Energy for example are pushed by elites to help with depopulation efforts, and culturally they layer the green movement with feminism,Wiccan and goddess worship to groom people to accept this for example. Plausible but still will stuff which seems to ignore that Big business such as Big Oil could promote such conspiracies to keep us reliant on fossil fuels.
But on dialectics, in simple terms, dialectics involve understanding contradictions in nature, and we could simply quantify our understanding of such contradictions by comparing thesis with antithesis. This overlord class however, since they see themselves as superior, Darwinist and entitled, use manipulation to merge these conflicts to create “synthesis”, and this synthesis creates new epochs. But this Occultic class repeats the process until they come to a singularity point (i.e., a Luciferian apotheosis), where Dyer would argue can be seen through transgenderism, transhumanism, interracial relationships, etc.
My summary of Dyer’s “Occultic and Luciferian, dialectical inversion towards a new singularity (Monad)” ideas, can be witnessed in his film analysis of Annihilation starring Natalie Portman, Dark Crystal featuring Jennifer Connolley and David Bowie, etc.
To elaborate further on this “singularity” or “transhumanist” arc to Dyer’s thesis, one should view the video titled, Lucifer, Baphomet & Transhumanism’s Hermetic Origins: Jay Dyer & David Patrick Harry published 22 April 2024.
Also, Dyer believes in a literal Creation storyline in which suffering did not exist before the Fall of Man, so Dyer believes that what we consider to be predators such as sharks were herbivores. Only because of the fall did the introduction of sin and death come into the world, thus also did meat consumption.
He believes this, and this can be heard in the video titled, Jay Dyer Agrees Shareks Ate Kelp | Clip Know More News published on 18 September 2025.
Yet, in the video mentioned above with David Patrick Harry, Dyer seems to agree with Harry making the point that a world without pain, which is allegedly what Transhumanists want to do, is blasphemy. So…if a world without pain was closer to God per Dyer’s Genesis beliefs, but now it is bad if we live in a world without pain if it is brought about by Transhumanists?
But I would argue these “Transhumanists” that Dyer fears are actually more in alignment with his political leanings.
For example, Trad Bros such as JD Vance is a Zionist minion of Palantir and Peter Thiel, and a follower of Platonist thinkers who want monarchies, technocratic states, etc.
These are the Transhumanists.
It’s not broke Social Justice Warrior college kids but Silicon Valley Billionaires who are in alignment with the traditional Zionist power structure. This merger of Judeo-Christianity, Zionism, Noahidism, Technocracy, White Supremacy and End Times Eschatology seems to the transhumanist world which may entail the very conspiracies that Dyer complains about.
It is interesting to note that David Patrick Harry debated Adam Green of Know More News, meaning that despite differences, with Green being a Right-Wing Neo Pagan and Harry being an Orthodox Christian, both men by proxy are in the same online circles – even if unintentional – as Jay Dyer.
The video is titled, “You’re Ignorant! You Know NOTHING!” – Debate on Orthodoxy Turns into SHOUTING MATCH!” by the YouTube site, The Crucible, published on 17 June 2023.
In the same video interestingly is, Andrew Wilson, who like Jay Dyer contributes to the Man-o-sphere podcast called the Whatever podcast. This podcast seeks to shame and embarrass women.
This is video with Harry is a good video to capture Dyer and his contemporary’s beliefs about transhumanism, Darwinism, etc.
Books and figures mentioned in this video include:
- The New World Order by HG Wells
- The Open Conspiracy by HG Wells
- The World Set Free by HG Wells
- Between two Ages (1970) by Zbigniew Brzezinski
- Fourth Industrial Revolution (2018) by Klaus Schwab
- A brief history of the future (2006) by Jacque Attali
- Perennial Philosophy (1945) by Julian Huxley
- Utopia (1516) by Thomas Moore
- New Atlantis (1623) by Francis Bacon
- City of God by Tommaso Campenella
- Christianopolis: An Ideal of the 17th Century by Johann Valentin Andreae
- Programming and Meta-programming the Human Bio Computer by John C. Lily
- The Philosophy of John Dee by Dame Francis Yates
- Through Looking the Glass by Lewis Carroll (in relation to the philosophy of determinism).
They also mention figures such as Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Joachim of Fiore, Paracelsus, Roger Bacon, Isaac Newton, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, etc., but also organizations such as the Rosicrucian’s, who dabbled in Medieval or Enlightenment Era hermetic practices, but had influence on the modern world.
Further, this dialectical idea is expanded upon in Dyer’s “Books of the Elites” reading list such as the book Turning Point by Fritjof Capra in his video titled, The Secret Dialectics of the Elite – Turning Point by Fritjof Capra – Jay Dyer (Half) published on 13 July 2019.
In this video around minute 51:40, Dyer even talks about how oil is not an organic substance from older lifeforms such as dinosaurs (which to me aligns Dyer’s belief in a literal Seven Day creation story arc).
As one can see, Dyer is laying the framework, whether that is his conscious intention or not, to push Right Wing separatism. He’s laying the grounds for the academic and philosophical framing of Right-Wing apologia. Dyer would argue that dialectics are evil or could be evil because thinkers such as Marx used dialectics as the basis for this dialectical materialist framework.
For example, with Dyer being Christian, I could argue that Jesus having come and died for our sins, means that the if “race” was a sign of God’s punishment (e.g., the theory of people group’s arising from the Tower of Babel scattering or arising from Noah’s children after the Great Flood) or other Old Testament plans, then Jesus bringing a New Covenant would erase the need for such separation. For instance, Christians don’t eat Kosher or follow Leviticus diet laws.
Yet, even from a historical and real-world perspective, race as we know it today is largely a creation of colonial designation systems intended on creating and justifying hierarchies for exploitation.
The same “British Occultic Imperium” which Dyer alleges to be the mastermind behind the modern world, utilized such as racial segregation or its own benefits, so does this mean that Dyer agrees with what this satanic cabal did? Is Dyer not a beneficiary of these systems?
Even if I apply modern science, which isn’t entirely incompatible with religion, is that Dyer being a white guy from Appalachia is descended from “mixing” such as Old-World Europeans like Cro-Magnon Man being mixed with later Anatolian Farmers, and then later Eurasian Steppe Herders who mastered the use of the horse.
Anyways, Dyer believes that modern rights, feminism, internationalism, cosmopolitanism, revolutionary movements, environmentalism (which to Dyer can be used to justify austerity and de-population efforts), globalism (where criticisms are often a dog whistle to white supremacist isolationism) are natural products of the erosion of God from public space and are even intentional Satanic agendas to create a global “monoculture”. For example, in Dyer’s analysis of Capra’s Turning Point, Dyer links feminism and environmentalism as intertwined agendas, e.g., Goddess worship (witchy culture), to culturally engineer the collapse of patriarchy and the dawning of a new era (i.e., Age of Aquarius).
HOW THE RENAISSANCE PLAYS INTO DYER’S THESIS
Dyer ultimately begins with analyzing and talking about Classical philosophical foundations, notably Monism, Dialectics, Platonism, and Neoplatonism, as laying the basis for th modern Occult and Illuminus movements for the Renaissance and the Enlightenment Period. To Dyer, The Enlightenment regave birth to gnostic and esoteric teachings which found homes in secret and political organizations (e.g., the Masons, the Jacobins of the French Revolution, the Illuminati, Alumbrados, etc.) as well as early merchant & banking guilds, and the nexus of these groups started the revolutions to overthrow Christian monarchy, which then later morphed into postmodernism, capitalism, socialism, scientism, secularism, feminism, etc.
But, rather than being a natural evolution of ideas from various sources, there is a controlled narrative best typdied by the term “the New World Order” who are moving this ancient-to-modern trajectory forward.
Hence, magic of old simply became science, and science thus is an ungodly tool being used to push humanity towards a Luciferian singularity point such as transhumanism.
Dyer would believe in “Dark Science” in the modern world as being the natural evolution of “black magic” or “alchemy” of older eras, yet, to Dyer, notably since the Enlightenment Period, which produced frameworks such Capitalism and Communism, that modern world is defined, as already stated, by controlled flux managed by a “Trans-Atlanticist” (US, UK, NATO) ominous global elite (which includes the hodgepodge of every group in conspiracy theory culture such as The Bilderberg Group. Davos, World Economic Forum, the Jesuits or Opus Dei of the Vatican or Catholic Knightly Orders such as the Knights of Malta – harkening to the popularity of Dan Brown’s The DaVinci Code -, the United Nations, CIA, MI6, etc.) .
Being Third Position, notably an Orthodox Monarchist, Dyer rejects capitalism and liberalism such as that of Right Wing figures such as Jordan Peterson because he believes the classical liberalism’s emphasis on the self naturally leads to the solipsism and postmodernity which Peterson alleges to hate, notable with his popular term of “Postmodern Neo Marxists” (which got a lot of push back by philosophers or philosophy students pointing to Peterson’s lack of understanding and the weaponization of the term postmodernism to fulfill his Right Wing needs – similar I would argue to how Nazis used the term “degenerate art” to define any sort of modernist movement).
Yet, Dyer is adamantly anti-Socialist and Leftist, which to me is more of sign of him expressing his identity as a white, Christian, heteronormative male, raised in conservative politics who would see anything as opposite as possibly being a threat to his world, privilege, power, etc.
Separately, Dyer believes the Moon landing is fake, he pushed Anthony C. Sutton’s theses that the Bolshevik Revolutions and Nazis were funded by Wall Street and that the World Wars and Cold War were manufactured events of the Trans-Atlanticist, etc.
Dyer has also pushed the standard Right-Wing conspiracies (i.e., notably popular amongst American Southern and Western conservatives involved or at least sympathetic in the small government, militia and/or survivalist movements who sometimes use terms such as Jeffersonian to describe their politics) such as those of the Federal Reserve system being part of an international cabal.
Dyer essentially takes from antisemite and Holocaust denier, Eustace Mullins who wrote Secrets of the Federal Reserve, but who also proliferated the common conspiracy trope of the English based Tavistock Institute being used for brainwashing the masses and also pushed Illuminati Theories.
Dyer in multiple videos talks about the Tavistock Institute, but notably you can see him pushing this idea in the video titled, The Beatles a British Psychological Warfare Weapon?- Jay Dyer on Rock N Roll Twilight, published on 6 June 2018.
Dyer talks about how counterculture with the help of the Stanford Research Institute via a White Paper, titled, Changing Images of Man, and in concert with the Tavistock Institute, were shaped to engineer the masses to be conducive to a One World Government. Dyer and others believe the Beatles had sent her to reconquer the United States for the British using WWII studies developed by the Tavistock Institute.
This idea seems plausible but why would the UK want to undermine the Industrial muscle of the USA it relied on in the post WWII era? The US led economic order, though replacing British hegemony, was a sustaining force for Post WWII Britian through economic assistance, and if anything, the flood of Americana into the UK as an invasion (producing Teddy Boy and British Greaser culture), was simply re-packaged and sold back to the Yankees “across the pond”.
Dyer, however, omits antisemitism from this conspiracy work often to the chagrin of actual antisemites, despite both factions being anchored in Right Wing thinking.
Dyer seems to omit analysis on Israel because he was born a fundamentalist Protestant before joining or at least considering converting to Roman Catholicism, before he settled on Eastern Orthodoxy. Hence, Dyer is likely a Zionist (despite his claims of not beign one), thus making him at odds with the reactionary Right who are anti-Israel, but not because of humanitarian reasons (e.g., the legitimate treatment of the Gazan peoples) but because of pure antisemitism (i.e., blaming the Jews for everything).
Dyer also pushes the “Hollyweird” narrative (inspired by the book Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & the Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream by David McGowan) which is to show that Hollywood is controlled by this cabal of Atlanticists and they mix the Occult, defense, and entertainment to produce “alchemical change” in the masses, which one could pragmatically call “cultural engineering”. Dyer published his own books called Hollywood Babylon to spread this worldview. It is important to note that the Hollyweird movement is often coded in Right Wing reactionary movements, notably as diversity and inclusion has forced traditionally white male leads to share the screen with women and people of color.
This Hollyweird movement often tries to vindicate people such as Mel Gibson who went on this antisemitic rant, because many see Hollywood as a Jewish controlled organization, meaning this theory has levels of inherent antisemitism. Yet, because the Zionists movement itself is a Right-Wing movement, the Zionist in mass media often promote this Hollyweird theory to cultural groom the Right Wing, which is more in alignment with the MAGA movement, which is supportive of the State of Israel.
In other words, even though the Hollyweird theory is layered with antisemitism, the Zionists don’t really care if the Trump Administration keeps up its pro Isreal stances, and even if antisemitism does rise, the Zionist lobby can use that to clamp down on free speech against the State of Israel itself.
Lastly, this Hollywood movement touches upon topics such as child abuse, which leads to the conspiracy realm of Satanic child abuse, which then feeds back to Dyer’s emphasis on ritualistic abuse and trauma used by the elites (MK Ultra, Project Monarch, etc.).
This segway into Hollyweird tropes and Lookout Mountain AFB created hippies of Laurel Canyon, Dyer also talked about David McGowan’s Programmed to Kill, where Dyer presents the idea of “Bloodying society” by releasing serial killers (some who were allegedly involved in MK Ultra descended programs, such as the CIA back Phoenix Program). These serial killers, who overlapped with the counterculture movement, or at least arose in the wake of 60s Free Love, were inserted to break the will of the trusting public, thus making people more nihilistic and ungodly. This therefore prepares society for the upcoming “Luciferian singularity” which Dyer alludes to.
The problem with this theory, is that Dyer and others don’t acknowledge the fact that serial killers were often trying to maintain existing social orders such as patriarchy but rebelling against women’s liberation for example, which did challenge the male ego. That is not me being a social justice warrior, but admitting as a man that patriarchy maintains itself with the threat of violence and total denunciation of female sexuality and agency which is not catered towards procreation.
Dyer would even trace this “controlled flux of global elites” back to Classical Antiquity such as the diving into the philosophy of Plato (and even further back philosophers who laid the basis of how we understand basic reality) and the later mystical Platonic interpretations for the philosopher Plotinus of the Roman Period.
Thinkers like Plato could be argued as wanting a hierarchical and elitist Republic based on caste systems, but Plotinus would develop the basis for the Occultic, Heretic, Masonic and/or Gnostic underpinnings and overlay to this Platonic (top-down hierarchical) agenda.
COMPELLING ARGUMENTS
I admit that a lot of what Dyer says is compelling. He is well read into philosophy and if you separate his conspiracy theory or analytic nature, he would be a great adjutant professor somewhere. However, reading my summary of his beliefs, it is easy to see that his worldview could be weaponized against the West for the benefit of other global powers such as Russia or China, even if that is not his intent.
However, Dyer has converted to Eastern Orthodox (notably over this view on the filioque stance of the Orthodox Church) and has showcased the works of Aleksandr Dugin, who was close to Putin and Kremlin.
Undermining trust in Western institutions, notably the powerful media sphere of Western media, can benefits states hostile to the West such as Russia, China, Iran, etc., or could even help create internal civil unrest to push the West more far right for the benefit of pro-Western Right Wing regimes such as that of Israel, in which the Netanyahu regime promotes American Right Wing media because the Western Left has criticized Israel and stood up for Palestinians. Yet, two things such as what I said can be true at the same time.
Interestingly, Adam Green confronts Dyer, Aleksandr Dugin, Dr., Jiang, and the YouTuber Sneako.
I have been suspicious of Dugin and the general Right Wing for years, but I find it interesting that Green, who I used to follow, though unfollowed because of his clear dog whistles to White Identity Politics, has a video about these three Right Wing figures who appear to be conscious and unconsciousness (as in the case of Sneako) assets for foreign governments to subvert the United States.
Green’s issue though with people in this video, notably Dugin, is that Dugin appears to blame Western Whiteness while obfuscating from Zionism or Israelis, thus Green feels Dugin is a controlled asset (which could be very true – granted, I don’t agree with Green’s whines about “anti-whiteness”).
See the video, titled, Multi-Polar Order, Abrahamic Unity & Russian Propaganda, published 23 April 2026.
Jay Dyer could be defined as an Eastern Orthodox Christian Conspiracy Analyst.
I say analyst as opposed to theorists, even though he does a lot of theorizing, because Dyer often attempts to discern the readings of actual public policy publications, futurist white papers, science fiction, entertainment media such as that of Hollywood, exposes into defense funding of academia, etc.
For example, Dyer even referenced one of my actual college professors, Dr. David Price, who wrote the book Weaponizing Anthropology.
These are all legitimate endeavors, and he appears to approach each reading he does critically and with a varying level of skepticism. There is no doubt for example that media has been a tool of government propaganda to manufacturer consent for things such as war, or that intelligence agencies have used religious missionaries to infiltrate other countries. These are all facts. Stating facts are not the issue, but rather how we summarize the accrual of those facts, notably through particular and potentially problematic and/or self-centered worldviews which can be the issue, and this is my issue with Dyer.
So, if there are larger agendas at play, Dyer is simply reading what he thinks are blueprints for a “New World Order”, however, his conclusions are nuanced by his particular Orthodox Christian and Right Wing viewpoint, so even if there are larger plans at play, he has a bias blind spot, though to him he does not because he feels anchored in a philosophical worldview of Orthodox Christology (which is incompatible with secularism and even other religious frameworks, Christian included).
THE WORLD WE LIVE IN
The World We Live In Now is Ripe for Right Wing Reactionary Conspiracy “Brain Rot”.
We live in very paranoid and reactionary times. The paranoia could be understood as originating from the informational overload we all get through social media of the World Wide Web, which is littered with an almost infinite amount of conflicting and coalescing narratives and explanations, notably as people are naturally pushed into echo-chambers. By me writing this I am ironically engaging this waddling of information amongst the waves of the internet. Further, adjusting to emergent technologies be it A.I., genetically modified foods, mRNA vaccines, etc. There is a lot of hope and fear all mixed in real time and being explained by a cacophony of legitimate researchers, conspiracy theorists, your uncle who watches Fox News, or your sister who reads Mother Jones, etc.
These hopes and fears for an array of reasons (e.g., natural social consequences versus targeted informational campaigns, etc.) become distilled and separated amongst partisan lines. Add this paranoia on top of a reactionary world, notably in the West which is defined by a reemergence of traditionalist Christian thinking and yearnings, and a revolt against feminism (in exchange for patriarchy), diversity (in exchange for white supremacy in Western nations), social justice (in exchange of Biblical Law), empathy (in exchange for strength), and democracy (in exchange for Third Position politics spanning monarchism, “techno-feudalism”, anarcho-capitalism, fascism, etc.). As a result, the state of West could be best defined as a Reactionary, quasi–White Supremacist revolt against Modernity which co-opts, contorts, and controls Conspiracy Theory culture to create easily proliferated messages on mediums such as YouTube and Instagram to the masses.
Further, even though I am not approaching this paper from a Marxist analysis, the truth is late state capitalism is a real thing and the consequences of it are that there are less opportunities per the logic of capitalism itself, since capitalism produces efficiencies which replaces the labor people need to earn wages to survive on.
We can witness this by the “woe as me” narrative often used to explain modern masculine insecurities, notably because more men are not going to college, cannot afford homes, and seem depressed in world awash with sexual imagery online yet seemingly lacking sexual and procreative possibilities in the real-world (i.e., the failings of dating culture). In summary, there are is growing number of people, where a lot of them are young men, living in an informational overload epoch of late stage capitalism, yet, instead of critiquing this system explicitly, two Right Wing veins have emerged as reactions, with one being the “Capitalist Apologia” crowd where this movement tries to inspire young people to double down in capitalism with “business bro culture”, crypto currency, day trading, etc., but the other vein being the “Third Position” crowd which often rejects capitalism, as well as any Left Wing social thought, in exchange for theorical or archaic modes of social organization such as monarchy, Romanesque fascist states, etc. Nuancing these two reactionary movements are “subcultures” which serves as glue or connecting node points which enhances the power, visibility, and reach of the movements. These subcultures include the Men’s Rights Movement (i.e., the Manosphere), Mixed Martial Arts (MMA), conspiracy podcasts such as Alex Jones or Sam Tripoli, the “anti-woke” Comedian scene (often seen with Joe Rogan as the leader and Rogan also bridges into MMA), the naturalist food movement (which does not seem bad but it has led to movements such as the All Meat Diet, the Raw Milk Drinking diet), etc. There is nothing inherently wrong with these subcultures, but they can lead to a Right-Wing trajectory all the way to the Far Right. For example, the Far Right has appropriated MMA culture which White Supremacist groups such as Rise Above, or even the naturalist and environmental movement can be coopted by fascism. For example, limiting immigration can preserve nature and reduce pollution, etc. It is no different than the Nazis using yoga, Alpine hiking culture and even veganism as covers for a clean way of living which was inherently coded by the Third Reich towards racial supremacy and purity.
AUTHOR NOTES BELOW
I began writing this post about two weeks before the day of 5/5/26, but I was unable to post it because I have been trying to re-read, edit, etc. Regardless, since then I have noticed a new revelation regarding Jay Dyer. He has started collaborating with John Kiriakou, the ex-CIA Officer turn whistleblower on the subject of waterboarding during the Iraq War era. I find this interesting for many reasons. First off, YouTube had what I called the “CIA Officer Influencer Wars”, where you had figures such as Andrew Bustamante seen as competing with John Kiriakou, and John largely seems to have played the social media landscape better by not coming off as strong-headed, nihilistic, yet apologetic towards the “Deep State” as Kiriakou. Bustamante made a splash by going on all the write “conspiracy” or “deep state analysis” podcasts and YouTube shows such as Danny Jones, Julian Dorey, The Flagrant 2 Podcast with Andrew Schulz, etc.
But, personally, I think Bustamante just rubbed people the wrong the way by always trying to appear like the smartest person in the room and this seems to have made people see him as having more an agenda, notably by pushing a realpolitik, Machiavellian viewpoint directed at countries such as China (which I am not saying is necessarily a bad thing). Andrew essentially just came off as a person still in cahoots with the Deep State his criticizes but Andrew doesn’t disagree with the existence of the Deep State, using noble lies, being laws to protect national security, etc. However, with Bustamante seemingly pushed to the side for Kiriakou is just something to take note off in the Social Media influencer wars for space and clicks. Kiriakou seems popular because he has spoked out against Israel, which is very popular these days because of the Crisis in Gaza (Genocide in Gaza), the creepiness around Benjamin Netanyahu’s influence and presence in American politics, and revelations about racism, xenophobia, anti-Christian sentiments in Israeli society, etc. Because of this pivot towards being able to be critical of Israel in Western, notably in American society, it is easy to gain popularity on social media because the evidence of Israeli brutality, colonial expansionism and realpolitik is more apparent and visible than ever.
Regardless, Kiriakou has been featured on RT TV, i.e., Russia Today, which is a state-owned channel that is presented as an ordinary channel on YouTube for years often featuring “Western Critical Media” through the lens of expose work or journalism.
By Western Critical Media I mean critical of US military intervention, NATO, Israel, etc., and had ties to whistleblowers such as Julian Assange. Abby Martin for example was a popular Left Wing-like figure who spoke out against Zionist actions against Palestine, and Abby takes up space within the Anti-Imperialist Left sphere on YouTube which can be seen in channels such as The Grey Zone with Max Blumenthal, The Useful Idiots with Matt Taibbi and Katie Halper, Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, etc.
There is nothing wrong with being critical of Western actions but criticism does feed into the propaganda of states such as Russia who wish to expand their own sphere of influence over former Soviet areas while also equally meddling abroad in places such as Africa with their military contractors or Latin America (e.g., the beliefs of Vladmir Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, etc.).
To me states such as Russia, just like any other country wishing to infiltrate another nations, spread soft-power, etc., will court both sides of any given state’s political spectrum.
Russia appeals to the Left by speaking against Western imperialism and military primacy, while appealing to the Right Wing by alleging the West is “decadent”, amoral, “postmodern”, “globalist”, etc., thus appealing to anti-European Union (i.e., Eurosceptic), ant-diversity, and often nationalistic and white supremacist movements (e.g., Golden Dawn in Greece, the A.f.D a.k.a., Alternative for Germany, etc.) spanning fascism, monarchy restorationists, traditionalists, etc. Russia has been effective in infiltrating US Republican Politics (e.g., the case of Marina Butina, networking at the US Prayer Breakfast, etc.) but also steering narratives which could be popular amongst the American Left such as decrying NATO support for Ukraine.
So, now that Dyer and Kiriakou are working together I can only conclude for now that something is going on.
I think the Jay Dyer’s recent pivot to being publicly vocal about criticizing the establishment of Israel is from an opportunism standpoint. Dyer rarely spoke about Israel, Zionism, etc., but rather focused on alleging the West is behind the New World Order. I can’t disagree with him there but I found his restraint on talking about Zionism or Israel rather suspicious, considering Zionists are a key faction of the Western power sphere, or what I call the “ACZSE” (pronounced like “aces”) Network.
Because, Dyer never spoke about Israel, he was criticized by other Anti Zionist figures such as Adam Green of Know More News.
Dyer is aware of Green and they have a mutual dislike of each other, and Dyer seems to refuse to want to talk to Green based on my assessment of the feud.
Dyer realizes that Green has an audience who is anti-Zionist and also Dyer understands that it is both safe and even lucrative to criticize Israel, I believe Dyer is simply adapting. If adapts he can eat into Adam Green’s demographics (which I will speak about below) and gain more of audience. Yet, Dyer is likely still a Zionist and Pro-Israel, but like the actual Israeli Lobby, they actually appreciate antisemitism, criticism towards Israel (which isn’t necessarily antisemitic), etc. By co-opting the rage and paranoia about Israel, and even pushing it, the Zionist lobby can then point to all the Antisemitism which they use to clamp down on free speech so they can continue advanced Zionists causes such as Anti-Boycott, Divest, and Sanction laws, etc.
Dyer is a Creationist Orthodox Christian, who rarely spoke negatively about Israel, so the current pivot seems suspicious, and maybe a way of infiltrating the Adam Green-sphere of influence into order to steer them towards and Orthodox, thus Pro-Russia stance. For a true zealot like Dyer, if he wants End Times prophecy to happen, him pivoting towards an Israeli Critical framework, doesn’t undermine Zionism at all, but in a way feeds back to already proven Zionist strategies (e.g., using anti-Israelis rhetoric to help push Pro-Zionist censorship). [End Beginning Notes].
OTHER NOTES:
First off, I want to briefly touch upon a few fallacies or concepts which we should keep in mind as you read my post/paper. That being (A) Multiple things can be true at the same time. These multiple things can be conflicting or complementing. (B) Simply because of person says a lot of right things, does not mean their conclusions or filtering of those facts are correct. (C) Also, bad actors, racists, bigots, etc., can say factual things, but you must separate their negativity and bigotry from objective information. To me, it appears many Right-Wing figures are more willing to do investigative research into taboo subjects (thus giving them narrative control over hot button issues as compared to the seemingly more erudite political Left). However, Right Wing bias on certain subjects shifts it towards conclusions that meets their narratives (e.g., promoting paranoia around White Genocide, etc.), even if the data leading to those conclusions are inconclusive. Such taboo for example are subjects which analyze the Israeli lobby, but because no one else talks as much as the underground Right Wing does on this matter (not to be confused with the traditionally Zionist mainstream Right and even within New Media such as that of Charlie Kirk, Tim Pool, and Alex Jones), the Right Wing is more able to control narratives to push other agendas, i.e., white supremacy, alleging feminism or multiculturalism are conspiracies, etc.
Secondly, before analyzing Jay Dyer and his beliefs, I want to say that I am not conclusively convinced that he is some asset. It is plausible but there is no clear proof of it. However, I do think that Dyer’s influence has made him into an unknowing asset possibly, because the analysis can be taken by larger forces without his consent. An obvious statement to make, but Dyer may be so into his own thesis that he may put the blinders up, even subconsciously, to not believe his work is inspiring bad actors, even if these actors share some common beliefs with Dyer (e.g., on matters of gender, race, etc.). For example, Dyer has been accused of being a Russian asset and this is something I can sort of agree with (his intellectual links to Aleksandr Dugin and Nina Kouprianova), yet, it is impossible to know if Dyer was involved for instance in the Tenet Media Scandal, in which Right Wing figures such as Tim Pool and Bennie Johnson were discovered to be have been receiving Russian propagandist money (though, this has not dented their careers at all). If anything, Dyer is just an Eastern Orthodox “fanboy” who apologizes for Russia by proxy of his religion.
Thirdly, and related to the second point above, to save the United States we have to understand our relationship with conspiracy theory culture, identify the main sources of contemporary conspiracy culture within “new media” platforms such a social media in which older generations may not be as adept at navigating or understanding (which is vital considering they have economic and political power, i.e., many Boomers fell for the MAGA Movement due to Qanon), and lastly understanding how the USA is a gaping hole of security breaches capable of being exploited by foreign actors (allegedly Russia, the Chinese Communist Party, North Korea, Iran, and even Israel) who study American conspiracy culture in the means of co-opting it and using it to create domestic social unrest, mass paranoia, ethnic tensions, etc.
Mitchell Research Group 