filmreview

Defending Christopher Nolan’s Casting Choices in The Odyssey. Understanding what the Right Wing backlash is really about by MRG Staff (Original 5.19.2026) (Updated 6.3.2026)

(Added 6.3.2026) If the cast of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey were all Greek, no one would probably see it. So when you hear people criticize the casting of Black actors and not using Greek Actors, what makes people think that people would see a movie with an all Greek cast? People are hiding their racism under easily challenged arguments. People are not admitting that recognition and celebrity matter in Big Budget films. I don’t know any Greek actors. I am sure there are many great ones. But, this Nolan film is an American-British, i.e., not Greek production, so the market is for Americans and Western Europeans firstly, and that market is full of notable black celebrities. Even if no actors were black, the fact still remains that a multi million dollar budget would have not been greenlit by Hollywood without known celebrities, and yes, celebrities can be black. Travis Scott for example has a large multiracial fanbase and that fanbase may be exposed to Greek culture and thus increase Greek tourism by seeing The Odyssey.. That is how Hollywood works. That is how capitalism works. So, I am not buying the argument that casting black actors is erasure, when really, the movie might lose money by casting all Greek actors, especially in story which is public domain and be made many times before (notably with all white casts). White Right Wingers are trying to push “Great Replacement” Theory as they always do. Simple.

(Added 5.20.2026). Sunny Hostin stated on The View that Greek culture was heavily indebted to Afro-Asiatic and Middle Eastern culture based on a book called Black Athena. This book was written by a white man, Martin Bernal, who was a Professor Emeritus at Cornell. Bernal argued that Greece was colonized by Egyptian and Phoenicians who brought over the cultures, and Bernal felt that “anthropological racism” of the 18th century led to undermining non-European influence on Greece. Though, Bernal may have been wrong in talking about a physical colonization, it is non debatable that “information” did spread among people groups. In other words critiques of Black Athena are doing the “throwing the baby out with the bathwater” trope. They fear any inkling of truth so they disregard any plausibility to a theory.

First off, Semitic culture does fall under Afro-Asiatic language family which also encompasses Cushitic, Egyptian, Chadic, etc. What Hostin is saying I’d that Classical Mediterranean European (Indo European) culture was influenced by Afro Asiatic such as Phoenician literally shaping our modern phonetic alphabet. Egypt for example was started around 3,000 BC whereas Mycenean Greece was 1,750 BC.

Minoan Civilization thought to be European is now being proven to have been genetically diverse based on Anatolian Farmers, Semitic seafarers, and who knows what else.

Further, the 25th Dynasty incorporated Nubia which had “black skinned” Africans. The Classical world believed in many God’s and these figures often were adopted by variously groups and in different renditions. The Greco Roman world later was inspired by Iranian Zoroastrian ceremonial magic and philosophy around 500 BCE.

Hostin is correct to point out the diversity and flow of information in the ancient world which often undermines our modern notions of race and nationality.

People are angry at Hostin because she represents a “vocal, black female” allegedly pushing woke ideology on a female centric show targeted at people’s moms. People, whether its some black men, white men., etc., see Hostin wearing a “loud and proud” Nutcracker Soldier outfit who comes off as the type of woman they despise compounded by her allegedly pushing woke ideology when really she’s speaking some facts.

The facts aren’t the issue but rather people’s fears of how those facts will be applied within our current social disourses notably around race.

Better put, though Hostin is partially right, people fear her inspiring what they consider to be the elevation of black status within white European culture, which is why Right Wing reactionaries use belittling monikers such as “We wuz kings” to undermine black influence by associating black people explicitly with “ebonics” or “black ghetto culture”. The “We wuz Kings” saying, often used by online trolls, undermines the importance of “We Wuz kings”. African tribes did have kings and queens and black people – who speak ebonics because white supremacy created a divergent black American culture in many regards – have a right to feel good about our pre-slavery past. Making fun of We Wuz Kings points exactly back to white supremacy and why black people say it to begin with.

Hostin isn’t saying Athena is black but rather black people had influence on Greek culture, even if the scope is debatable. So, black people such as Nubians or whomever had varying degrees on Greek culture, it should not offend people to cast a black women as Athena or Helen, etc. You can further add on to my support of Hostin by adding the obvious fact that Western Civilization forcibly absorbed black people. So, not only is there historical pretext for black participation in European mythology (notably of the Mediterranean region), but there is modern justification based on European Colonialism assimilating many black groups of people’s (e.g., African Americans are a Western branch of people because they speak Indo European languages, have European surnames often, practice Western Christianity, etc.)

Of course Hostin was going to be attacked by the online predominantly male community of history enthusiasts and film and gamer fans.

Hostin doesn’t have the optics they like, and her message undermines their want for a sense of “white solidarity” or masculine heroism.

The backlash is simply many white or non black people not wanting black people to celebrate too much abour having any impact on Western Civilization and to explicitly link black people to what they consider to be inferior culture. It’s often petty and juvenile “you can’t play with us” mentality. They don’t want to believe that the scary black guy may have a stake in Western civilization.

Even if people aren’t explicitly racist, we do live in a time of blatant white supremacy resurgence, which has adapted by appropriating “anti-Colonial, anti-Imperialist, and self-deterministic” speaking points from Left Wing anti racist and anti fascist frameworks. Thus modern white supremacy often frames white issues under a victimhood mentality despite white people overwhelmingly still controlling the means of production and supporting superstructures such as law, state violence, markets, etc. (End Addition. 5.20.2026).

I grew up around white people my whole life. So much so, people called me “white”, but being called that I was able to hear genuine “white grievances”. I was also the black kid to always respond with “what’s that supposed to mean?”. I know white people, especially their frustration around what they feel is being silenced or canceled. Most white people I think are decent people but I will be talking about white supremacy and I know that term triggers people but bare with me. If anything, I think white supremacy hurt white people by creating a reality of exceptionalism which often denied their own struggles and pains.

I challenge you to read this. I have experienced legitimate racism though I don’t “play the race card” which is a concept that many white people feel that black people use our advantage. But, I am going to “go hard” here.

Not all of the criticisms of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey are about race. For example, I don’t really see Matt Damon as Odysseus. Criticisms may not be about race but simply not liking a specific actor or not liking the costume choices. But…. I hate to go here but interstingly the Right Wing culture warriors leave me no choice but to assume race is a factor. Looking at our world there is a backlash against diversity and migration. The word globalism, once a key tenet of capitalism, is a taboo word which Right Wingers of the West equate with “white genocide”.

I am writing this in landscape of Nick Fuentes, Nick Shirley, Benny Johnson, Alex Jones, The Blaze, Chud the Builder, Lily Gaddis, Sydney Watson, etc. The world is in a Right Wing era despite allegations of “liberal decay” because liberal decay as I say isn’t merely ideological (i.e., woke ideology) as what a conservative would think but is the reality of capitalism catching up. By that I mean Resource Wars displacing people, technology replacing people’s jobs, the over saturation of information causing depression, etc.

But….

So… if “the West is the Best”…. then why are Right Wing reactionaries not flattered by non-European actors participating and honoring foundational Western works? It is almost as if minorities are expected to assimilate but only up to a point which still maintains white dominance and protect white egos, i.e., secondary and support roles and characters, i.e., “the help”. Or, simply be invisible.

Christopher Nolan has every right to make the casting choices he made for his up and coming film, The Odyssey.

Art is supposed to expand consciousness and not always reaffirm or spoon-feed our desires.

Seeing the backlash has me thinking we should start a hash-tag called #SupportLupita or something to that effect. I may go buy a few tickets just to help out.

The Odyssey has been done plenty of times already. According to Microsoft Copilot Search, I looked up “How many times has The Odyssey been made?”, there are at least 287 adaptations.

The majority of the backlash I see online, either from social media comments or YouTube videos, is that people are angry Nolan cast black actors as Ancient Greeks. In addition, people are angry about Elliot Page being in the film, since he transitioned from female to male, so you of course get a “chud” or “bro” reaction. [Note: a Chud is a term used to describe someone who is socially unpleasant, unintelligent, or reactionary, often with political or online connotations.]

However, some of the backlash may be from the fact that the Academy Awards require films to meet diversity and inclusion standards to be eligible for the Best Picture category. To qualify, a film must pass at least two of four specific standards spanning the cast, crew, production company, and marketing.

Standard A (On-Screen Representation): Focuses on diversity in casting or the film’s subject matter. It requires having at least one lead or significant supporting actor from an underrepresented group, a diverse 30% ensemble cast, or a storyline centered on underrepresented groups.

Standard B (Creative Leadership and Crew): Requires diversity behind the camera. This can be met by having underrepresented groups in department heads (like the director or cinematographer), having a diverse general crew, or having at least 30% of the crew come from underrepresented groups.

Standard C (Industry Access): Requires the production, distribution, or financing company to offer paid apprenticeships, internships, or training opportunities to underrepresented groups.

Standard D (Audience Development): Focuses on in-house diversity. It requires the studio to have diverse teams working on the development, marketing, publicity, or distribution of the film.

But, there’s no proof that Nolan made his casting decisions based on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives. But even if he did, what if Nolan is supportive of such initiatives? By reading the Academy Award standards, one can see that you can have all white cast but the crew may need to reach out to an underrepresented groups for crew support or an internship. Considering the history of Hollywood, I don’t see this as bad. And, I truly think that most people when thinking about DEI they subconsciously think black. But underrepresented could be something such as disabled veterans, first generation of something, or could be income based as defined by area code economic statistics, etc.

Conservatives seem to be insinuating that either Nolan was forced to diversity because of the “woke mob”, or, they are insinuating that Nolan is chasing (pandering) to diversity. Both are disingenuous takes potentially.

Me defending Nolan is interesting because way back, after Nolan blew up with the Dark Knight series and Inception (though I knew about him from Memento and Following), I did feel that Nolan did have a slight sense Anglophilia to his films.

Christopher Bale played Bruce Wayne where Wayne is culturally associated with WASPy characters such as Patrick Bateman from American Psycho) where Bale played Bateman.

Bruce Wayne being a wealthy white guy wasn’t my issue, but more so I saw “bros” feeding off Bruce Wayne’s energy, similarly to how people think Patrick Bateman was cool despite being a serial killer and cannibal. I noticed in the years leading up the victory of Trump was that many conservative men were seeing themselves in Bruce Wayne by Nolan. An “alpha” and “capitalist” who saves he world.

Yet, Nolan’s Dark Knight series with characters such as Heath Ledger’s Joker did become appropriated by twenty-teens early Alt Right culture, which now over a decade later has morphed into the Red Pill community, Men’s Rights personalities such Andrew Tate, crypto bros of WallStreet Bets reddit pages, but also “bro astrology” with Alphas versus Betas verus Sigma males, but also, Make America Great Again frat boys, Looks-maxxing figures such as Clavicular, etc.

That WASPY Anglophilia I suspected in Nolan’s films, I believe to his surprise, may have served as a mold for what we consider to be the Alt Right, i.e., young men who flirt with fascism (nationalism, strong men leaders, patriarchy, hierarchy, Darwinism, etc.) who absorbed Jordan B. Peterson. They espouse a Julius Evola “reject modernity and embrace tradition” sensibility by dressing up like yuppies or London 1980s nostalgic “posh boys” or as if they are Great Gatsby characters. Don’t forget the Peaky Blinders hipster haircuts and Billy the Butcher from Gangs of New York mustaches. The “hipster Right”.

Basically, people vicariously live through characters they see in film. If Tom Hardy were killing people butt naked most of these reactionary men would not care but if they see a black person….

That is what the backlash to The Odyssey is about.

Instead of transcending race and focusing on the moral and power of the story, in 2026, due to the normalization of white supremacy with figures such as Nick Fuentes, etc., you have younger people notably not even thinking that racism is bad.

Since the election of one-half Black president and clik bait articles or talking points about how white people may be minorities, a good segment of the “white West” has been slowly losing their minds, yet also for many finally finding something to rally around.

A lot Zoomers don’t remember the attempt at post-MLK 1970 thru early 2000s attempt at racial harmony. The only know riots, Trump, memes, and 8chan racism. Society largely failed young people by not realizing stories about harmony are vital in teaching morals and ethics.

Regardless, and back on track, the film Troy, the 2024 movie adaption of The Iliad by Wolfgang Peterson, has Helen of Troy played by Diane Kruger who is German, Brad Pitt who is Scots-Irish mostly, and the rest of cast is heavily British, with Eric Bana playing Hector being half-Croatian meaning he was the “closest” to Mediterranean heritage.

And guess what? White people were not freaking out then because Right Wing reactionaries only care about race, not art, but race. Or, rather art that solidifies, enforces, and affirms their racial identity.

Having grown up my entire life in predominately white areas and spaces, I can attest that many white Americans either fully embrace their American heritage and don’t care much about “the Old World”, but there are many who are constantly looking for connection to Europe. This isn’t a bad thing, but it does show a need, and needs can veil insecurity.

By focusing on racial authenticity in art, what people really want is long-term insurance of continued racial segregation because in theory you need races to exists in order to maintain artistic authenticity. Many people who claim to want to preserve “Western Civilization” aren’t talking about language, philosophy, art, architecture, but they talking about a territorial “insider versus outsider” group mentality. A cult of purity.

The interesting things about being “white” is simply what you look like. Most racists aren’t doing DNA tests, but only care for the optics of skin, hair, etc.

Further, race is such as ambiguous concept because one could argue that European has many indigenous races with certain genetic traits (e.g., North Europeans versus Slavic versus Mediterranean versus Finnic, etc.).

So white supremacists don’t seem to care about one white group overwhelming another white group, just as long as they “appear white”. A white supremacists may try to rebuff by saying “at some level we (Europeans) share a common ancestry”, but the when does history begin and end? When humans left Africa? When humans from Anatolia spread into late Ice Age Europe for fertile land and mixed with old World Europeans (Hunter Gatherers), who may have previously mated with Neandtherals? Before Yamnaya Indo-Europeans from the Steppes moved into Europe?

If I have 6% European DNA, am I included? if my child has 56% does that mean he’s included?

Racists are…just stupid. They bitch about the “Woke Left” but who is always moaning?

You can literally breed for “race”, even in isolation by simply singling out and breeding for characteristics.

Racists are sort short sighted as well. If a person is half black and half white for example, and that person is surrounded by white people, that person will likely marry and bear child with another white person, meaning their child is 1/4th, then eventually 1/8th, and eventually 1/16th, 1/32th,1/64th,1/128th. You can take my example for a person in an all black community, which was often the case for mixed race children during America’s barbaric colonial and Antebellum time periods. That’s why I likely have 6% Northern European DNA!

The more racists talk, the more they disprove their own beliefs, but they don’t care about logic, beliefs, etc., but only optics and aesthetics, but also they need separation because they fear competition in a larger pool of people. Segregation thus increases their odds for survival so they think.

The Odyssey as a film has been done with white actors…forever, so does it really matter that Nolan cast the way he did?

I say no.

A lot of the backlash is from the smorgasbord of Right Wing online culture which is a pool of angry gamers and fantasy nerds (typically while male), Boomers with microphones, and trolls which is your standard “anti-woke” crowd.

They are only angry that black people are in the film, which to me interesting considering….Western Civilization fell on black people. How is a society going to forcibly absorb a people (forcing language, religion, nomenclature, economic systems, philosophy, etc.) and then say….you can’t participate in the foundational texts, myths, etc.?

For example, people of African descent, who were forced to be Christian mostly, are expected to believe in Jesus and The Bible without question, but cannot participate in the myths, stories, etc., of Western Civilization which fell upon us?

Part of me believes that no one really believes in anything, not even God, and yes, I direct this at many Christians, because really they just worship identity.

Or, for example, nobody told Europeans to sail to Japan and threaten them with cannons to open up their country. Chinese people did not ask Europeans to flood their country with opium from British Controlled India just so English people could trade for tea. No one asked Spaniards to show up to Latin America and genocide Native Americans. The list goes on.

You don’t get to force your culture on everyone, say that your culture is better and then get angry when people participate in your culture.

Western Civilization fell on people, more than others (i.e., as in the case of African Americans or Black Diaspora peoples), so I see no issue with “race swapping”, just as long as there are some rules, but the rules have nothing to do with white people’s feelings but more so being true to authenticity for authenticity’s sake.

Those rules being (1) If a work has never been done before, then a film should strive for historical accuracy which includes casting actors who looked like those historical figures. This should tried to be done as much as possible for follow-on creations but with every creation done, the more ability to cast non traditional actors is more acceptable. Chatacters should also try to be sourced from the nations those stories arise, though economic concerns such as profit should be weighed (2) If a story is based on mythology, fable, etc., then artists have latitude to adapt works to different situations, locations, etc., but if the story was never created before for film, then the original release should be true to how the people looked who created those stories, (3) If a real historical storyline has been done enough times to where the original historical story can still be associated with its true origin, then artists have the ability to “swap” characters, (4) Since racism, colonialism, patriarchy, etc., are real things with real consequences, then the stories of minorities are more protected, only because these groups often lacked the institutional power to create art that reflect their lived experiences. For example, a black person being cast as Merlin in a Camelot King Arthur movie is more acceptable, than a white person making a film with all white actors trying to explain Malcolm X’s story. Sure, because of First Amendment free speech, a person can say or make whatever art they want for the most part, but a white person doing such a thing, versus a person of color doing such a thing aren’t entirely the same because you have to factor in actual historical context in relation to institutional power, and minorities often lacked power.

The reaction just goes to show how racist societies can be at their core, despite the notions that it is a “civilizing force”.

Civilizing what? White supremacy won’t even let non-white people fully within their ranks, even if a person fully emulates the expected behavior forced upon them.

However, I do believe that Western Civilization and White Supremacy are two different things, because Western Civilization is really a confluence of various ideas, concepts, etc., which aren’t inherently native to Europe, and even if so, not inherently racists, but just so happened to have flowed over into Europe over time due to migration, trade, etc. A civilization is a series of systems which holds ontological constructs, semiotics, aesthetics, etc..

For example, the West was heavily influenced by Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Central Asian, etc., and yes, Sub-Saharan Africans were not fully alien to “White Europeans” considering cultures such as the Greeks wrote about black Africans.

White supremacy on the other hand is an ideology which stresses that Western Civiliation led by white passing people is innately superior (despite as already stated it being influenced by outsider forces) but most importantly, the optics of “white skin” is more important than anything.

Look at gangs such as the Proud Boys. They say ‘the West is the Best” and even had diversity in their ranks earlier on, but of course, if became more and more of an explicitly white supremacist organization.

My simple response to reactionaries like this is that The Odyssey is a allegorical and moral tale, so you can swap out the characters, settings, time periods, all you want just as long as the moral message remains the same.

This is one of the points of art. Art isn’t just about being the same, otherwise it’s not really “art” but replication.

Art from a conservative framework seems to be art that is always the same, but maybe just done again and again with new technological formats (e.g., Clash of Titans with clay-mation, versus 300 with CGI). But, conservatives want things, notably optics concerning race to always be the same.

But, this misses the point that The Odyssey, similarly to folktales such as Robin Hood, Little Red Riding Hood, the works of William Shakespeare, etc., can be done in different times, formats and with different characters regardless of race, gender, nationality, etc. MacBeth for example has been redone by Japanese people in Throne of Blood (1957). Sons of Anarchy (white people like that right?) was based on MacBeth. Or, Shakespeare has been recasts in films like 10 or Three Things I hate About you (based on a Taming of the Shrew), or the movie “O” set in a prep school based on Othello or Virgin Territory (2007) based on The Dacameron, etc., or even Ethan Hawke playing Hamlet in the backdrop of the Manhattan Upper East Side One-percent.

Throne of Blood

Two or Three Things I Know About Her

Romeo + Juliet injected glam, Afro-Latino, etc.

Further, not only can you play and adapt these old allegorical tales, but if we consider “intellectual property rights”, these stories are so old they are “public domain and property”. You don’t need permission to make an Odyssey or Iliad Film, same as you don’t need permission to make Robin Hood.

So, because A) these stories are public domain and (B) their allegorical nature permits them to change settings, identities, etc., there is no real reason for the backlash to Nolan’s casting decisions besides the very real truth that as of 2026 we are living in a “reactionary, race realist sensibility” which pervades politics, media, etc.

The critiques only care that they aren’t seeing an all-white cast or using a Trans man in a cisgender male role. It is that simple.

They thus use such controversies to point to their concocted narrative that the world is “anti-white” or “trying to erase white identity” which feeds back into their overall agenda of white supremacy, separatism, and trying to create a “Pan-White self-determinism” (even going so far as appropriating Left Wing anti-colonial and deconstructionist arguments to justify their beliefs).

It is that simple. White supremacy, not only needs to dominate fields such as law, policing, military leadership, business, media, etc., also needs to be a victim and to sell the myth that “white honor” is under threat by “hordes” of “ungrateful, uncivilized, and overwhelming” non-white forces.

The controversy is spurred on even further by younger Millennials but mostly Zoomers who were raised in the “Social Justice Rejection Period” of the mid-twenty teens to present. Zoomers for example were just becoming aware of politics as children during the times of the George Floyd and Black Lives Matters protests, but also spend most of their time online, which was bolstered by COVID lockdowns and lack of paternal controls. Parents may filter against adult content which is great, but most could never comprehend the deeper layers of irony found on forums such as 8chan.

Even though what I am saying is a gross oversimplification of a complex issue and demographic, the truth is many young people who now look to figures such as Nick Fuentes, Lily Gaddis, Jake Lang (who is half Jewish), Vrillium, etc., were indoctrinated with an anti-diversity and pro-race realism campaign which arose from the chaos of the Social Justice “Woke” Era.

But, I fully support the Social Justice and “Woke” Era. There is no excuse of racism period, so I will not throw the Social Justice era of the twenty teens under the bus because ultimately that is what the Right wants. They want the Left or Liberals to feel defeated as Right Wing ideology thrives and they want the Left to see this Right Wing reaction as justified because of Left wing mistakes, such as daring to criticize white supremacy and patriarchy. Thus, the reaction to Nolan’s film could be seen as just a tactics in a larger “Right Wing, Pan-White” strategy. If pushing progressive conservations lead to fascists reactions, then instead of cowering away, maybe society should double down on “woke”? If the threat response of the Right is to gerrymander, repeal women’s reproductive rights, try to revoke women’s rights to vote, hate on immigrants despite building no functional immigration system, and be racist toward black people, then…fuck off. The world is almost giving into a conciliatory posture towards actual fascists.

White people want the rights given to traditional minority groups, despite, overwhelmingly still being the majority. Further, the conditions that black people in the USA have wasn’t their choice traditionally, and even with slavery and Jim Crow things of the past, what was once clear institutional bigotry, simply morphed into codes, hiring practices, white flights, etc..

Before the United States, black people were of different tribes and groups, but they were all forcibly merged into the racial distinction of “black” by racist colonialist policy. So, white people wanting minority rights when they are not and when they actually created minorities’, is pure irony. Even if white people are not the majority, such as in places like South Africa, the white population used extreme violence and draconian segregationist policies to maintain their status. So, white supremacy isn’t innately a numbers game but it is a mentality and concerted effort.

What most good intentioned white people believe in equality but they fail to realize that simply believing that equality exists doesn’t mean there can’t be issues such as systemic racism.

I believe most white Americans are good people but they make this simple mistake of treating reality like an “even, transactional playing field at all levels and in all systems”. And despite many white people being good people, when confronted, there seems to be a tendency to isolate out racist incidents as “one offs” rather than a trend, yet, ironically, minorities seems to be labeled more so as a collective operation.

Many white people want to believe that everything is a level playing field, so when minorities speak out and mention words such as “White” there seems to be a natural aversive reaction in many white people, and then they feel offended they are being associated with racism, and, as we saw with the election of Trump, they vote not because they are racists but because they think they are speaking up for themselves. They think falling for a white supremacist psychological trick is rebellion. By trick, I mean being goaded into supporting the actual system that minorities have complained about, just so that “superstructure” can persist with buy-in from the working white masses. If anything white people are too exploited by white supremacy because white supremacy puts white on a pedestal that people end up believing, and this can actually cover up their own hurts, needs, etc.

Even though I am not a Marxist, he did have some “fire” points, such as ““In Marxist theory, the superstructure refers to all the non-economic aspects of a society that are built upon the economic base, which includes the forces of production. It encompasses institutions such as politics, law, culture, and ideology that arise from and serve to maintain the economic base. Marx posited that the superstructure is shaped by the economic base but also plays an active role in influencing it. Essentially, the superstructure reflects the values and beliefs of the ruling class and helps to perpetuate their dominance in society.” (Source: Wikipedia).

As I sum up my post, you often hear Right Wingers try (emphasis on try) to joke about “race swapping in film”. For example, they will see the casting decisions of people like Christopher Nolan, and say “Why can’t we have a white Malcolm X or MLK?”.

This is funny because A) white people don’t really know much about black history so they always default to those two figures, and B) no one is actaully stopping a person from making a film with a white person swapped for a black person.

Go for it. But, people will have a weird reaction and I will explain to you why.

Black history as already stated was on the “wrong end of the stick” already in relation to white dominated society, so race swapping historical black figures, is more like kicking someone who has already been down, considering black people have never owned the means of production over entertainment in the West, only up until recently and it is still very minor.

It’s the exact same reasons why Blackface which comes with the whole package of history relating to the KKK, lynching, slavery, etc., Dave Chappell painting himself with white skin will not be as impactful to that of blackface. Is what Dave or Druski did crude? Sure. I don’t see a point in it, but it is not an apples-to-apples comparison when weighing in historical context and material reality.

In honorable quest we strive to achieve everyday, the truth remains that context, power, history, do matter, and frankly, white people are not oppressed collectively by any other group in the West.

Americans like easy things. When forced to think to much, we struggle sometimes. Even though we want a game with equal rules for everyone, sometimes making minorities feel like everything is equal is actually a struggle. Equal to a white person may feel even, but to a minority might feel like a hill they must still climb as they navigate systems and their identity which were mostly designed to alienate them.

Sure, people can say, “we have black films” or “Latino films”, but power does matter here in the discourse. Black people are a historically oppressed people within the American Experiment and European colonialism. There is no denying that. The history of racism, minstrels, slavery, Jim Crow, plantations, etc., means that Black people are permitted to feel a sense of self-worth in a land that has always tried to undermine black self-worth. Black people hade no choice but to be nationalistic because it wasn’t about swing down on weaker groups, but simply trying to survive. Put it this way, if you don’t like things such as “black nationalism”, well…blame white supremacy for helping to create it.

Even in the modern world, rather than showcasing black success and excellence you are more likely to see white guys with cameras trying to make YouTube videos about Chicago’s O Block or LA’s Compton.

Even when black people achieve and contribute, there is an almost innate need to keep the focus on negative black issues.

But why?

Because black people were intended to be the “antithesis” to white people within the construction of the American project. This is even why non-whites who are not black such as Asian, non-white Hispanics, etc., often “swing down” on black people to differentiate themselves so they can fit in with the “white superstructure”. Even, “white minorities” of old such as Irish, Italian, Jewish, and Polish immigrants engaged this “swinging down within America’s dialectic” as I call it. And, sure, are black people perfect’? Not at all. But, aesthetically, black people are intended to be lower so others feel higher. So, I commend Nolan, even if it wasn’t his intention, for using art to subvert the innate racial preference of Western Civilization, which as stated had fallen on Sub-Saharan African people (i.e., We didn’t land of Plymouth Rock. Plymouth Rock landed on us! as stated by Malcolm X).

Black people were intended to be the Ying to their (white) Yang, so America is obsessed with exacerbating differences as a medium of control. We literally just had a black man circle the moon, but rather people want to see black men committing crimes to reinforce their own beliefs. Yet, a person may say “well, black people only talk about race” and my response is “sure, why not, because race is what this racist society gave us” and by “gave us”, I mean literally every worst aspect of being that could be enforced on people up until recent times (the nineteen seventies at the lates, despite laws being signed in the the sixties, yet even since the 1970s, conservatives have been trying to chip away at the laws which sought equity amongst the racial groups such as voting rights in the South, affirmative action to ensure equal access to employment opportunities, etc.).

White people already have historical privilege in the West. I am sorry if “white privilege” angers you, but….if you read what racist say…they are literally SAYING they should be “privileged before everyone else”.

One could argue that race swapping white with black is actual erasure considering black ancestral culture was largely destroyed, whereas black people in white roles is really about assimilation and inclusion, i.e., being able to finally participate. Until black people are supported in regaining what was lost to them, black people are…here. I am literally a black man speaking an Indo European language, was raised on a King James Bible, and I have a Scottish or English last name.

I AM WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

I AM A CHAMPION OF IT.

AND… if anything, my skin is a testament of endurance within it.

SO…FUCK OFF.

I’m as Western as any German whose ancestors were worshipping trees who eventually got assimilated by Romans and Franks.

The Right-Wing Canadian Infiltration of the United States? When something silly sounding is very real. How the film Canadian Bacon (1995) kind of foreshadowed the actual Alt-Right invasion of the United States. This is not a joke…

Why are all of these pundits coming from Canada? Seriously…. They’re all Canadian. It’s always the ones you least expect… Jordan Peterson, Steven Crowder, Gavin McInnes, Stefan Molyneux, Nina Kouprianova, Ezra Levant, Laurent Southern, and the movie poster to Canadian Bacon (1995) by Michael Moore

Is the film Canadian Bacon by Michael Moore prophetic? Was it on to something without even realizing it? South Park by Matt Stone and Trey Parker even has its comedic take on Canadians. But, in reality…why are all these Right-Wing pundits…Canadian? Seriously? Have we become so cynical that people who want to do harm to the United States simply have to partake in our cynicism and disbelief? Laugh with us? There was the curious case of Anna Chapman along with nine others back in 2010 who were caught as being Russian spies and were given back to Russia in a spy exchange at an Austrian Airport (Sources: Russia spies plead guilty in US amid swap rumors by the BBC, 8 July 2010; The secrets of Anna Chapman by the BBC, 28 March 2011). We all should know the odd case of Maria Butina in the GOP NRA scandal. The agenda that is most prevalent to me right now, at least a piece of it, is how Right-Wing Canadian pundits that have gained influence in American politics but these people are simply the proxies of an international Zionist cabal spanning MAGA in the USA, the British Right Wing, Israel, and Russia. Trust me… I know that last sentence sounds silly. It will be called that. But I assure you, if you have not heard of people like Lauren Southern, Gavin McInnes, or Stefan Molyneux and their effects on American populism, you are the one who is out of touch. The global phenomenon of the Right Wing revolution isn’t organic but is actually a constructed movement unbeknownst to those who participate (you’re average Trump rally attendee), to build up mobilization for the defense of Israel and to link a newly rebranded traditionalist Russia with the West and USA on conservatism (whiteness).

The film Canadian Bacon I saw as a kid in the mid-nineties, and it did not leave much of an impact. Yet, I am watching it right as I write this. Be warned the film is full of 90s cheese (which is rather enjoyable in the dark times of late 2020) with some grunge music playing by people who are way too old to be listening to it (trying to capture the 90s Fugazi college crowd?), and a black character even drops the 90s phrase, “Can we all just get along”. Yet, brilliantly in satire fashion, akin to that of Don DeLillo’s 1985 book White Noise, Moore uses absurdity and hyperrealism to capture the time immediately after the Fall of the Soviet Union (I was a child) in which the USA was figuring out where to go considering there was no major enemies and the USA throughout the nineties enjoyed relative peace despite defense contractors trying to figure out how to create new revenue streams (sometimes going as far as fraud). It features a ragtag bunch of local cops (John Candy, Rhea Pearlman, Bill Nunn, etc.) who help foil a plot to start a new arms race. The film begins with the closure of a factory owned by a major defense contractor named Hacker Industries in a blue-collar community near Niagara Falls.

The film deals with the conflict of employment in the time of peace considering many US jobs are based within the Military Industrial Complex. The president of Hacker Industries working with a Washington insider, the President’s National Security Advisor Stuart Smiley (played by Kevin Pollack), tries to stir contempt to help boost the arms industry, even though the President (played by Alan Alda) wants peace. However, the President later meets with the Russian President, named Vladimir of course, to reignite Cold War tensions to help boost his popularity and employment numbers. The Russian President jokingly states that Russia is now concerned with state-of-the-art plumbing equipment and America should not be sore winners. The Cold War was costly to Russia. Later on after their plan to reignite war with Russia falls through, General Dick Panzer (played by Rip Torn) while conducting a briefing in the war-room (alluding to the Dr. Strangelove war room) goes through a list of enemies spanning Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Min, and even floats the ideas of an alien invasion. The President floats the idea of international terrorism (an ominous reference considering the Council of National Policy in real life was prepping for the Global War on Terrorism, and other Hollywood films, like True Lies, foreshadowed the emphasis on the Middle East) but Rip Thorn states that terrorist are just a bunch of people blowing themselves up in rental cars. The President then floats the idea of Canada.

The President’s National Security Advisor later consults a veteran CIA agent named Gus (who is still salty about the Cuban Missile Crisis and Korean War) who argues that Canada is the enemy. While strolling a hallway to talk in private, a hallway adorned with photos such as that of Henry Kissinger, Gus and Stuart have a conversation: “You remember the big New York blackout?” “Yea” “Caused by a Canadian hydroelectric plant, Niagara Falls. The Canucks claims it was a faulty transmitter, we have reason to suspect otherwise…” “Why is that?” “These Canadians suffer from a serious inferiority complex. That’s why they built this (whipping out a photo of the Canadian National Tower). World’s tallest free-standing tower. Our scientist cannot figure out what it is for. Canadians are always dreaming up a lot of ways to ruin our lives. The metric system, Celsius, Neil Young…Jesus. We admired them… Clean streets, no crime, no minorities” “How’d they pull that?” “No slavery…. Their entire government is run by socialist” “But it’s not the real stuff”, Stuart responds, before Gus continues, “No no no…that is where you are wrong…they’ve always had these tendencies”. Stuart reads a newspaper cutout, “Capitalism must be destroyed in all its forms? What is this??”, before Gus interjects, “We think they are a little weird with the socialism stuff… They provide free healthcare, education…. free condoms!”. Later, back at the war council room, the President and his staff float the idea of labeling Canada an enemy. One advisor, an African American man, states, “Hell, they’re whiter than we are!”. Yet, the President agrees to manufacture consent against the Canadians, later slipping the story to the media who starts their campaign of muckraking, Charlie Rose-like panel discussions, CSPAN knockoff updates, etc.

Gus later appears with a CIA team posing as Canadians to blow up a power-plant, but the power station is of course being guarded by John Candy and his crew. The event goes viral and causes the American public to believe the elaborate rouse even more.

A funny line so far is when a character, Kabral Jabar, played by Bill Nunn, while attending an auction of surplus military gear of a recently closed plant owned by Hacker Dynamics (maybe a ploy on General Dynamics, though the logo does reflect Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, etc.), says, “Listen, can we get out of here? All these guns and white people have me feeling nervous”, but John Candy playing Sheriff Bud Boomer, says, “Can you knock it off with the white stuff. You got me looking at em funny”. The fact Michael Moore gave Candy’s character the surname of Boomer obviously alludes to the Baby Boomers but considering this was the nineteen-nineties the term Boomer wasn’t used then as it is now, e.g., a term meant to prove the Baby Boomer’s general sense of selfishness and ambivalence to everything while simultaneously having the need for authority such as surface level politics, cops, simplistic dynamics of good guys versus bad buys, religion, etc.

But the plot of Canadian Bacon aside… There is something sinister coming from Canada in our reality.

The next stuff is serious. I am not…joking.

Canada used to send us quirky comedians. People who came from a higher latitude of the English speaking realm that we assumed had a natural predilection for left-wing, center-left, or moderate politics – granted they do have an important rural heritage as well – considering their single-payer healthcare system, the general perception of cleanliness, a general acceptance of cosmopolitanism, bilingualism, the fact that most of their population centers around urban areas doting the various provinces, and unlike Americans, the Canadians kept closer to their British roots which in itself is seen as more well-read, artistic, capable of understanding the “abstract”, and parliamentarian in nature. The Canadians or Canadiens are our slightly smarter younger sibling who stayed closer to our “parents” as we rebelled to be free but ended up like David Hasselhoff eating a cheeseburger off the floor in a drunken stupor or a film like Robocop makes so much sense it deserves a statue in Detroit.

Americas always saw Canada as the better place to the North with its own unique quirks. Nasally accents and using words like gee, or an over usage oh, or phases like don’t ya know. Something innocent about it. Yet, in recent times, especially in the times that led up to Trump America, I must admit that things have changed about Canada’s export of entertainers. They are all Right-Wingers and often extreme Right-Wingers. This isn’t the era of Jim Carey, John Candy, Mike Myers, Catherine O’Hara, Eugene Levy, etc., but rather we got a ragtag incendiary bunch comprising Steven Crowder, Lauren Southern, Gavin McInnes, Jordan B. Peterson, Nina Kouprianova (Richard B. Spencer’s allegedly – I believe her – abused ex-wife), Stefan Molyneux, and Ezra Levant (a Jewish-Canadian Right Wing Zionist) with his “Breitbart of Canada” media outlet in Rebel Media (an outlet that has hosted controversial figures such as Alex Jones and was linked to helping organize the United the Right Rally in Charlottesville, VA). I am sorry but Ezra Levant looks a lot like the main character from the Cohen Brother’s A Serious Man. Just saying. Is the United States being invaded by Canada? It sounds funny, it sounds like a movie-plot straight out of South Park or Canadian Bacon, but I am not joking even though it is amusing but…not. It is quite easy to do. We in the United States scrutinize people from South of the Border but is the same treatment given to those North of the border, and if not, gee I wonder why?

How clever of an idea when you think about it. Culturally similar nations with a predominately white population which can at times be reactionary to change, in right-wing politics at least, especially that which challenges the notions of conscious and subconscious supremacy (immigration, gender equality, people of color in lead roles, etc.). If the United States were to be invaded, sure, it could come from South of the Border with Mexico, or be from some shadowy terrorist cell, but we often don’t see Canada in the same light, even though the chances of espionage or infiltration is much higher with our Canadian sibling. It is not the Canadian government that is the issue, but rather non-state actors who are betrothed to a well-funded religious-political agenda that spans the United States, U.K. and Commonwealth, Israel, and Russia. More to come on this later.

Gavin McInnes, formerly of Canadian media outlet Vice Media (which interestingly has links to the Manhattan Institute founded by former CIA head, William Casey, via Vice’s former correspondent, Raihan Salam and this institute also has ties to PayPal founder, Peter Thiel – an ardent Trump supporter and owner of the infamous IT firm, Palantir), represents the Oi! Oi! Right Wing takeover of the British late-seventies punk scene and he uses the prevalence of political correctness, “wokeness”, and the elevation of marginalized groups to turn conservatism into “punk” against the mainstream. McInnes created the Proud Boys harkening back to the right-wing street thugs of the National Front in Margaret Thatcher’s right-wing 1980s England. The Proud Boys, supposedly started as a joke by McInnes, despite being known in the public sphere for years were elevated even further in Trump’s debate against Biden in which Trump stated, “Stand back and stand by” when asked about if Trump would denounce white supremacy, specifically when asked about the Proud Boys. The Proud Boys employ a strategy of surface level silliness to divert attention away from their chauvinistic West is the Best ideology. The Proud Boys require a beat-down initiation in which a man must read off as many as ten breakfast cereals while getting beat up. It seems childish and borderline like suppressed homoeroticism (considering McInnes has made-out with Milo Yiannopoulos) or MGTOW behavior (Men Gone Their Own Way) especially with the prevalence of nude male Greek statues representing logos within the Alt-right sphere of thought. The Proud Boys are a sausage fest of angry males who need identity. This playful silliness is not just common to the Proud Boys who have documented cases of using violence, but also Boogaloo, who took that name from a nineteen-eighties pop cultural reference, who gained notoriety when US Air Force Sergeant Steven Carrillo was indicted for the murder of two deputies in North California in 2020 using the Black Lives Matter protests as cover and a means of inciting a race war.  

Lauren Southern and Nina Kouprianova with their “fraulein” looks aer the anti-feminists who represents femininity’s subservience to masculinity yet are outspoken in favor for militaristic masculinity protecting the “race” – a notion notable in the Right Wing [Note: Nina Kouprianova has been interviewed by vlogger, Jay Dyer, who converted to Orthodox Christianity, i.e., the main religion of Russia, and most of his work are directed at the United States and not at the current events happening in Russia. Dyer to me seems to have an affinity with “people groups”, i.e., differences as being ordain in his words by God). Lauren Southern not only went to South Africa to show a biased view of the racial situation in South Africa such as proliferating the white farmer murders (something Trump has tweeted about) but she has also flown to Russia to interview Alt-Right Anti-American intellectual Aleksandr Dugin.

Jordan B. Peterson and Stefan Molyneux represent an intellectual basis for Darwinism with concepts like “fitness”, “Bell Curves”, the strongest survives, etc., which are notable tropes of the Right Wing even though it hides in high-brow discussions of capitalism, intelligence, systems theories, i.e., alluding to the natural tendency to form social hierarchies which in and of itself insinuates a rejection of egalitarianism, etc. Steven Crowder represents the “bro” of the bunch. A frat boy beer drinking mentality which tries to out masculine you and harkens back to the days where the white male viewpoint of reality, including criticisms of others, dominated the landscape.

The fact that many are comedians helps deliver their messages into the public because they can simply state, “I’m just telling a joke”, so there is a level of solipsism and postmodernism in their tactics, where postmodernism comes into the mix because of the prevalence of memes, vlogs, and conspiracy theories/”true history” videos spanning or touching upon Indo-European studies (a gateway into Aryan studies such as the videos created by British Alt-Right vlogger, Survive the Jive), rejection of peer-reviewed and intensive studies such as the Out of Africa Theory in exchange for fringe theories such as Hyperborea, aliens (where aliens only seem to help people of color and not Europeans), etc., in the digital landscape. Postmodernism simply put (if it can be) is when the world has no reference of what the truth actually is, so truth is utterly subjective and an existential process, and the notion of objective truths or grand-narratives are false. Postmodernism was first a reaction to the atrocities of the right-wing after World War II, but now it seems like it’s being cleverly used by conservatives to deconstruct the new accepted truths of modern human rights, diversity, gender equality, etc. These types of individuals in the right-wing sphere in which I am speaking of broaden their base by being elevated on even more popular outlets such as the Joe Rogan Experience. Yet, whenever this side is called out, they can default to victim status by making it appear those who are fed up with traditionalism, patriarchy, racism, etc., are in effect nothing more than “commies”, “fascists”, “Marxist radicals” or “Social Justice Warriors” who are simply shaming white boys and women who love them. To stir this atmosphere of them being the oppressed or muzzled victims, any time a person is de-platformed they cry fascism, even though their very own ideology is the basis of fascism. They are playing games is where I am getting at. Using amorphisms and ambiguity to Trojan Horse their regressive ideology into the mainstream.

I’ve said this before but we truly live in the era of the Postmodern Conservative who uses deception tactics to de-evolve the modern liberal state back into a conservative homogenous state, but it claims to detest postmodernism in the vein of people like Pat Buchanan who popularized “Cultural Marxism”, despite utilizing postmodernism (asymmetric, shapeshifting, “what is truth?” – tactics, etc.) as a tool for its own agenda. Ironically, Donald Trump himself could be compared to Max Headroom, a Canadian character of a former Canadian TV show, where Max Headroom is a digital avatar and Trump in effect is the same with his use of the online arena to bypass the political process and stir up conspiracy theories to protect himself. The right-wing conspiracy culture that led up to Trump was the clay which gave us a Golem like Trump. Interestingly, certain portions of the Alt-Right, those more in line with the quasi-Nazi Occult elements, have even stated that they are using “magic” or magick when they troll online, i.e., they are willing their wants into existence using meme warfare.  

In relation to the Russian elements regarding my “Canadian Cabal” theory, 541,810 people in 2016 claimed Ukrainian descent, there were 622,445 people in 2016 who claim Russian or partial Russian descent in Canada, and in 2016 about 20,710 people claimed Belarusian descent in Canada. In 2016, Canada had a population over 35 million (compared to the United States with is around 300+ million). The number of people of Eastern European descent might not stand out as being significant, but for a much smaller nation than the USA, the amount of cultural influence cannot be calculated. As far as cultural influence all it takes is one person or a few to gain a large audience to disseminate and proliferate messages. Further, it’s much easier to “fit in” with their American counterparts, especially those in the Right-Wing, which is an arena spanning household “normal” center-Right politics all the way to fringe Nazism, the John Birch Society, the Tea Party Movement, Christian Extremists, Traditionalist Mormons who practice polygamy, Qanon, the Rise Above Movement, Boogaloo (which resulted in the murders of two law officers where the assailant wrote Boogaloo in blood at a crime scene – yet, our media unfairly characterizes the Black Lives Matter movement  as terrorists), the Right Wing occult (Order of Nine Angels, Atomwaffen SS, etc.), race realists, etc.

I am not saying espionage is happening from the Canadian government necessarily since they are US allies, but rather individual actors have the ability to infiltrate and change the culture of the United States by appealing to a sense of sameness. The United States could clamp down on these individual actors if they wanted to such as scrutinizing their visa status, look to see if they’re paying taxes, etc., but considering it is Trump America and he needs these people, it seems the Department of Justice is more concerned with a Hoover like condemnation of the left than it is protecting the USA from actual domestic and international agents who just so happen to be “good ole white boys”.

Most of the people I named are conservative and they speak on American politics more than they do Canadian politics. Is this not strange? Do American conservatives even call them out on this? No. Why? Because the white conservative base of America is so lost in fear than they will take anyone that looks like them and tells them exactly what they want to hear. This fear has created not only a business opportunity for entertainers but also a world-shifting opportunity for influencers who are attached to the agendas of larger and shadowy organizations, which I feel links to the controversies surrounding Trump. Most of these pundits are Trump supporters, even if they cannot vote in American elections. These pundits to me are in the web that spans Russia-gate (Israeli-Russian Gate), Trump, the Alt Right, and the US-UK & Israeli Zionist connection.

So, let me explain my beliefs based on that last statement I made. Russia was not alone in influencing the 2016 election, but rather Israel had the technological means and cultural connections within the United States to help sway the election in favor for Trump. For example, the Republican Jewish Coalition with people like Eliot Brody brought up in the Mueller investigation. Israel was displeased with the Obama Administration for abstaining on a United Nation’s vote over Israeli settlements on disputed Palestinian lands. This abstain vote by Obama resulted in a toxic backlash against his administration especially in the Israeli press and thinking that Hillary would follow suit with the Obama Administration’s policy (and that of previous American administrations who preferred to broker peace between Israel and Palestine), the Israeli lobby backed Trump, despite saving face and managing relations on both side of the political spectrum, particularly by denouncing antisemitism even though many people on the right are Jewish. So, in order to get the majority of the USA, which is white, to back Trump, the US Zionist and Israeli lobby spanning politics, media, alternative media (podcasting such as Ben Shapiro, Alex Jones, even Joe Rogan during his phase of platforming Alt-Right guests), Wall Street, and Washington insiders, effectively created and elevated the Alt-Right. This strategy has in part helped to metastasize into movements such as Qanon, which might still seem harmless to the average American, but people running for Congressional seats are openly pushing Qanon, Islamophobia, Pizzagate, and “Holly-Weird” theories.  It could be argued that Qanon is a cult but a cult for the internet age and it preys on the vulnerabilities of those in conservative politics. Qanon has a Zionist undertone to it, which therefore not only feeds into a support of Israel but also Western conservatism. It sounds strange by Qanon could be what helps turn the United States into something akin to the Handmaid’s Tale. A radical religious reactionary state where the courts are run by Noahide worshiping judges. Noahide is a form of Jewish proselytizing to non-Jews in which non-Jews are encouraged to worship the Jews as the Chosen people and to follow the Noahide Laws issued by Jewish clerics.

This reactionary Right Wing (predominately white) movement is filled with the fringe of conservatism (as we saw at Charlottesville) and is protecting Israel even if many of the people in this arena are not cognizant of it. I say this because many people in this arena have antisemitic beliefs but even antisemitic beliefs can be used by Zionist to increase their power. For example, appealing to a Christian Crusader “Dues Vult” mentality in defense of the Holy Land is essentially getting WASP Christians with Punisher skull tattoos, subscriptions to Soldier of Fortune, and a habit of dropping N-bombs while playing Call of Duty, to defend Israel, but these people must be convinced that they still are the majority, in supremacy, or are in jeopardy of being replaced. Basically, certain factions of the Zionist lobby are willing to fund Nazis as a diversion to what they’re doing but also to build a “street team” for Trump, but really Trump is an ally of Israel who will do what they want which can be seen in Trump naming Jerusalem the capital of Israel, landmarks being named after Donald Trump, the annexation of the Golan Heights in the wake of the Syrian War, leaving the United Nations Human Rights Commission, and leaving ambiguity around the contested Dome on the Rock between Jews and Muslims (which is where the Kusher relationship with the Saudis comes into play since the Saudis are the landlords or trustees of the property).

All these Right-Wing Canadians will shame minorities, the LGBTQ community, welfare, etc., but you notice they never talk about Jews. It is not that I want them to, but rather, they are all Zionists or tied to some sort of Zionist organization. They are the cover for the Zionist lobby simply put there to mobilize the majority that leans right into doing that lobby’s bidding. The marriage between White Supremacy and Jewish Zionism is not new and can trace roots in part back to the United Kingdom in the nineteenth century where there were British movements such as British Israelism where white Britons felt they were the chosen people in order to justify the British Empire. This grand origin story mythology is common among most empires or aspiring empires such as the Nazis trying to trace roots to Central Asia or India largely because they simply wanted that land, or even to the United States with notions like Manifest Destiny. Religions such as Mormonism were created during Manifest Destiny and used Zionist undertones to demonize Native Americans so they could take their land and bolster their own credibility (I do not hate modern, every day, and normal Mormons by the way).

The British elite establishment and the Jews who became prominent in the United Kingdom created a symbiotic relationship, and many prominent imperial administrators were Jewish such as Benjamin Disraeli, and, yes, the Rothchild Dynasty (responsible for helping acquire the Suez Canal, raising capital against Napoleon, treasurers of the Bank of England, etc.).

This symbiotic relationship or marriage of “mafias” resulted in the basis for the establishment of Israel in which the British helped the Jews acquire Palestine after World War I when King George defeated his cousin, Kaiser Wilhelm’s, allies in the Ottoman Turks who owned the area. Further, even though it is debatable, King George and the British Establishment with the help of American financiers, may have supported the Bolsheviks in order to overthrow the Czar of Russia in order to obtain the lucrative oil fields of the Caucuses. This symbiotic relationship surrounding being “Chosen”, i.e., supremacy, bled into the United States and Commonwealth nations thus influencing the treatment of the indigenous First Peoples and people of color in these regions (such as African-Americans with slavery which was argued with a misinterpretation of the Bible such as the Mark of Cain, Aborigines, Indians of the Asian Subcontinent, Africans in colonial Africa, etc.). The Rothchild’s did fund Cecil Rhodes’ DeBeer Diamonds in Africa and it is well known Rhodes was a Mason and racist, where Masonry in itself, at least that of the English realm has Judeo-Christian undertones.

Manifest Destiny in the United States was simply White Zionism similarly to how the British Empire was White Zionism, but the Zionism aspect is what links them to the Jews, even though these factions at times are in conflict (Waspy elitism of the Anglo-American establishment or the condescending tones that some Jews have of gentiles), but their working relationship as far as global control outweighs the negatives. In effect, these two groups of white Gentiles and white Jews can effectively merge with each other and have time and time again throughout history, even within some old European noble families such as Sophie von Hohenlohe (who spied for the Nazis) or Prince Rupert Lowenstein (the Rolling Stones former manager). Even though the common average white person or Jewish person might not mix as much, when you get to the upper echelons of power, then what’s ethnicity when all that matter is money?

It is my personal belief that all the weird events that happened from 2016 to 2020 in the present were simply this cabal coming to light for the first time to most Americans. The curtains had fallen and the system went into clean-up trying to get ahead of stories by pretending they were actually covering the stories in full, even though they were simply doing what a street hustler does when they play a “shell game”, i.e., moving around cups with a ball underneath it and making people wage money on where the ball actually is (sometimes the ball being taken away with a contraption so no one wins). For example, the Bronfman Clan of NXVIUM with their ties to the United Nations (via Sara Bronfman’s husband Basit Igtet who negotiated a peace deal in Libya after Hillary’s Benghazi situation), Edgar Senior’s ties to the World Jewish Coalition (where he advocated for improved Russian and Israeli relations) and Edgar Junior’s ties to the music industry; Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s ties to the British Royal Family and even the Iranian Contra era with characters spanning William Barr as a CIA operative around Reagan’s White House, John Kerry as a blue-blood old money Senator, Robert Mueller (classmate of Kerry) as a young investigator who worked on Iran Contra, Judge Robert Morgenthau (a relative to the Bronfman Clan), Adnan Khashoggi (uncle to killed journalist Jamal Khashoggi and Princess Diana’s lover, Dodi Fayed), the Clintons and the Trumps. This is deep stuff.

The Israeli lobby, at least that led by Benjamin Netanyahu (he does face opposition in Israel) and his allies in the USA and English speaking Commonwealth (various non-profits, social clubs, etc.), understand that hiding behind hyper-Republicanism of the majority in the United States is the best way to keep the light off of them and since Right-Wing politics are often Christian or Judeo-Christian in nature, this religious crux is a helpful variable that increases the power of this strategy. They can appeal to sense of Revelations, Armageddon, Holy War against Muslims, etc.  

Ok, so keep all that in mind, but what about Russia? The truth is that Russia and Israel are closer than what most Americans realize. In the Cold War, the United States utilized Christianity and Zionism as a means of psychological warfare to differentiate ourselves from the godless Soviets. The truth is many Israelis and American/Canadian Jews, or Jews of the Commonwealth are of Eastern European “Pale Settlement” or Russian Jewish descent. Prominent Canadian billionaire, Edgar Bronfman Sr., of the Seagram’s Dynasty, is the father of Claire and Sara Bronfman (incriminated in the NXVIUM scandal), younger brother to Phyllis Lambert (who bailed Ira Einhorn, the Unicorn Killer, out of jail before he pulled a Roman Polanski and fled the USA), and father to Edgar Junior (music mogul with links to Jeffrey Epstein), was the president of the World Jewish Coalition (WJC) and promoted Russian emigration to Israel. Edgar Bronfman, Sr., who was a racist (disapproving his son’s marriage to an African American woman, foreshadowing to me the racist rant of LA Clipper’s owner Donald Sterling), advocated for increasing Israeli and Russian ties. Israel is the crux between the USA/West and the East typified in Russia, and Israel can leverage those multi-national bonds to its favor if the policy of one deviate away from Israel’s own ambitions (consolidating its borders to that of the Kingdom of David and bring forth their messiah, the Mashiach). As an analogy, Israel has positioned itself to the be the woman that two powerful suitors are courting and play them off each other, even though the future of this strategy is for all to…share Israel or Israel to control both, as the Russians and the Americans by way of the Republicans (the party you would least expect) try to join forces.  A White Zionist alliance where the Israelis are the heart of the operation.

So, in 2016, Russia did have a major reason to favor the election of Donald Trump considering the sanctions they faced due to their invasion of Crimea and their tendency to generally annoy the United States by them conducting a “parallel policy” to the USA, e.g., if the USA has issue with Venezuela or Syria, then Russia steps in to show they are friends to these nations in the face of “American Imperialism”. Trump had done business in Russia, ex-Soviets turned businessmen had conducted business out Trump’s properties, Trump has links to many ex-Soviets in one way or another (Tevfik Arif, Tamir Sapir, Lev Leviev, etc.), many people in his cabinet had ties to Russia such as Rexx Tillerson for Exxon Mobil, Michael Flynn was called into suspicion, Rand Paul delivered correspondence to Moscow for Trump, and Mitch McConnell and other prominent Republicans have ties to Leonard Blvatnik etc.

The fact that Melania Trump is of Slovenian descent and Trump’s first wife, Ivana Trump, is of Czech descent, both former Soviet nations (which in and of itself is not a problem, i.e., they shouldn’t be shamed for this), I could imagine Donald Trump has a large following in former Soviet States as far as the media, tabloids, and news. Nations such as Hungary, Austria, Germany even (especially in the former Soviet Eastern part of the country which is under-developed in relation to the Western part of the nation), etc., has seen a rise in Right-Wing populist politics emulating the success of Donald Trump, and Russia sees this Right-Wing Revolution as good since they have ditched the Soviet style and in exchange are marketing themselves as Orthodox traditionalists against the depravity of liberal democracies, modernity, secularism, human rights, etc. This Right-Wing revolution in Eastern Europe which benefits Russia in its “rebranding campaign” can weaken the primacy of the United States by threatening NATO and calling into question the usefulness of the United Nations (the United Nations has always been a target of Right-Wing organizations such as the John Birch Society which helped coin concepts such as a one-world government. Interesting fact is that the Neo-Nazis in America trace roots back to an internal conflict within the John Birch Society in which a Revilo P. Oliver left the organization because he claimed the JBS was becoming too Jewish, which, even though I reject Nazism and white supremacy, he may have had a point considering post-war Neo-conservatism had many notable Jews such as Henry Kissinger, Barry Goldwater, Milton Friedman, etc.).   

In conclusion, Canada is awesome. It is still seen as an example of a modern and developed nation that fosters diversity, education, public investments, and a rational well-balanced foreign policy. Yet, all of that aside, many Right-Wing pundits are coming from Canada. This to me is no coincidence but rather proof of a larger cabal using these low-level actors, podcasters, and vloggers, to infiltrate the United States political arena by appealing to a sense of sameness and being the “online street team” for Trump. The question is will American conservatives start to call it out, or are they so enthralled with the insanity of Trumpism, that they will take support from any source no matter how nefarious it truly is?

#film #politics #review #canada #american #zionism #2020